Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies?

Dave Sill <de5-drums@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov> Wed, 02 August 2000 18:34 UTC

Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA24435 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:34:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA19614; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:34:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:34:21 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA19596; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:34:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sws5.ctd.ornl.gov (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA19583; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:34:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sws5.ctd.ornl.gov (160.91.68.105 -> sws5.ctd.ornl.gov) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:34:19 -0400
Received: (qmail 468243 invoked by uid 3995); 2 Aug 2000 18:34:19 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14728.27051.65313.862527@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 14:34:18 -0400
From: Dave Sill <de5-drums@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: smtpupd-12: <SP> optional in replies?
In-Reply-To: <200008021428.e72ESju00965@jean-baptiste.sendmail.org>
References: <gshapiro@gshapiro.net> <14725.1009.660906.108929@monkeyboy.gshapiro.net> <200008021428.e72ESju00965@jean-baptiste.sendmail.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 "20 Minutes to Nikko" XEmacs Lucid (patch 2)
Organization: Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA
X-Face: "p~Q]mg{; e*}YR|)&Q/&Q\*~5UWfZX34; 5M<gHyq0KvGt<$qi6=B7; $3~1p?Jc7-g?1vPVAc%YX$E6]%1jvk:,"f*jA|?~Cxb?WJ5gt}L?qsMAjROM~rHbK27yx=t,L/?IHb8@|cYg8"Y)~0IpU~J.^w,VW)u?M3q-AS{f`@RZ]Wll
X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Eric Allman <eric+ietf@Sendmail.ORG> wrote:
>
>In 4.2.1, I suggest changing:
>
>  In many cases the SMTP client then simply needs to search for the reply
>  code followed by <SP> at the beginning of a line, and ignore all
>  preceding lines.
>
>to:
>
>  In many cases the SMTP client then simply needs to search for a line
>  beginning with the reply code followed by <SP> or <CRLF>, and ignore
>  all preceding lines.

I support this change.

-Dave