Re: Negotiated noncompliance
Barry Finkel <b19141@achilles.ctd.anl.gov> Wed, 30 August 2000 20:57 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA09044 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:57:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA11408; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:56:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:56:13 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA11354; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:56:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from achilles.ctd.anl.gov (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA11321; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:56:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from achilles.ctd.anl.gov (146.137.32.1 -> achilles.ctd.anl.gov) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:56:10 -0400
Received: by achilles.ctd.anl.gov (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id PAA16981; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:56:08 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:56:08 -0500
From: Barry Finkel <b19141@achilles.ctd.anl.gov>
Message-Id: <200008302056.PAA16981@achilles.ctd.anl.gov>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Negotiated noncompliance
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Someone proposed this text: > > An implementation which receives protocol which is not permitted > by the specification SHOULD (if it is a client) abort the attempt > to send the message and (if it is a server) reject the command > with an appropriate status code (rather than assume that the > non-complaint server will deliver the message). I would change the two occurrences of "which" in the first line to "that", ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry S. Finkel Electronics and Computing Technologies Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-9689 Building 221, Room B236 Internet: BSFinkel@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4844 IBMMAIL: I1004994
- Negotiated noncompliance John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Dave Crocker
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Eliot Lear
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Dave Crocker
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Eliot Lear
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Charles Lindsey
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Barry Leiba
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Chris Newman
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Charles Lindsey
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Philip Hazel
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance DRUMS WG Chair
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Eliot Lear
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Robert Elz
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Philip Hazel
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Robert Elz
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Charles Lindsey
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Russ Allbery
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Claus Färber
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Graham Klyne
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Barry Finkel