IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any plans for drafts or discussions on here?

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 01 July 2014 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888F61A02F7 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 06:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZybhqFmYNKL for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 06:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A983B1A02F8 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 06:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s61DNArG078294 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 06:23:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-60.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.60] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <30316745-8091-46AD-95A1-407757489FF9@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 06:23:09 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FCF4AE46-D9AE-49D4-80ED-3268EB802AB0@vpnc.org>
References: <52DD996F.3040708@cs.tcd.ie> <CAF4+nEHEWaSr3HMuGtQ=vQzuuhkTo2uNpedUTNgmT5NsWRsTfA@mail.gmail.com> <30316745-8091-46AD-95A1-407757489FF9@vpnc.org>
To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dsfjdssdfsd/-EfCEBWsF7x7lAwOV3AcF3YQ8O4
Subject: Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any plans for drafts or discussions on here?
X-BeenThere: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The dsfjdssdfsd list provides a venue for discussion of randomness in IETF protocols, for example related to updating RFC 4086." <dsfjdssdfsd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dsfjdssdfsd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:23:17 -0000

I sent the following message over six months ago, but the draft was not updated, and instead expired.

Are people on this list interested in starting a different draft that obsoletes 4086 by giving more modern advice? I would be willing to edit but not contribute a lot of text; others here might want to contribute lots of text.

--Paul Hoffman

On Jan 20, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On Jan 20, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I've been a bit snowed under just recently and this week but I have
>> accumulated some changes and suggestions on the randomness requirement
>> sod security draft and do plan to do a revision soon.
> 
> It would be good to see those revisions. It still feels very wrong for us to be suggesting to application developers that they should be doing their own randomness; they should be asking their OS unless they are experts, and those experts don't need an RFC.

v2.1.10 | Report a Bug | By Email