Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] What has gone wrong with RNGs in practice

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 15 November 2013 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87F921F9D5E for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:46:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.409, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_11CONS_WORD=0.352, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eCy59aI6flXs for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9E321F9EF4 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96314BE5B; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4E1eMl2p9KFa; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 760DDBE55; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52864FD4.2000104@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:12 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick Mathewson <nickm@torproject.org>, dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
References: <CAKDKvuw6EovCf6sv5SsY=NBqYKWxc1K9yV4TZjNFbHXBrt6rDQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKDKvuw6EovCf6sv5SsY=NBqYKWxc1K9yV4TZjNFbHXBrt6rDQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] What has gone wrong with RNGs in practice
X-BeenThere: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The dsfjdssdfsd list provides a venue for discussion of randomness in IETF protocols, for example related to updating RFC 4086." <dsfjdssdfsd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dsfjdssdfsd>
List-Post: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:18 -0000

On 11/15/2013 04:36 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> 
> hoping this was useful,

Very useful IMO, thanks.

Its clear that lots of that is stuff that the IETF
can't help make better, but I think its all relevant
for discussion here.

S.