Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any readers here? Re: Risks of entropy available

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 16 December 2016 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5742F1297ED for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrLiEWdPCZmO for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190681293E1 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.129] (50-1-51-163.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id uBG2gLHo036887 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:42:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-163.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.163] claimed to be [10.32.60.129]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Dan Brown" <danibrown@blackberry.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:42:53 -0800
Message-ID: <EF4F73FE-9391-4370-B216-EF420D3BF2EA@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161216020620.5705805.17969.8573@blackberry.com>
References: <810C31990B57ED40B2062BA10D43FBF501083C12@XMB116CNC.rim.net> <20161216020620.5705805.17969.8573@blackberry.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5310)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dsfjdssdfsd/Af6GMLy7EIAIYZ0i5JrDae4KmyE>
Cc: "dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org" <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any readers here? Re: Risks of entropy available
X-BeenThere: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The dsfjdssdfsd list provides a venue for discussion of randomness in IETF protocols, for example related to updating RFC 4086." <dsfjdssdfsd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dsfjdssdfsd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 02:42:58 -0000

On 15 Dec 2016, at 18:06, Dan Brown wrote:

> Is anybody still reading this list?

At least one person. :-)

> Not sure if my previous post below was clear enough, ‎but if it was 
> clear and if it was read, then maybe it's just not concerning enough 
> to justify a reply?

It was clear and not concerning. If an adversary gets access to the 
/dev/random interface, that adversary probably has lots of similar 
access and therefore much worse things are likely to happen.

--Paul Hoffman