Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any plans for drafts or discussions on here?

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Tue, 21 January 2014 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B951A0280 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:27:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lGPUcCzK6lHl for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:27:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1841A027C for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:27:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B190D10224008; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:27:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 205.201.168.123 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:27:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c069fc0c102d6c487c86da0115223b56.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <52DD996F.3040708@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <52DD996F.3040708@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:27:11 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any plans for drafts or discussions on here?
X-BeenThere: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The dsfjdssdfsd list provides a venue for discussion of randomness in IETF protocols, for example related to updating RFC 4086." <dsfjdssdfsd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dsfjdssdfsd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:27:14 -0000

  Hi Stephen,

On Mon, January 20, 2014 1:47 pm, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> Just a health-check on this list. Anyone got plans?

  Thanks for the prod.

  Are HMAC_DRBG and CTR_DRBG suitable as general purpose
DRBGs? If yes, then do people see value in producing an
Informational RFC describing them? If not, what's the problem
and what's a suitable alternative?

  thanks,

  Dan.