[dsfjdssdfsd] what not to do...

Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com> Thu, 03 April 2014 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sandyinchina@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96CD1A0048 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZMH4_VdjKKT for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592CC1A0043 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 63so1065772qgz.6 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dMMpkVYC5n9XRYniGG0/pIjXcD+aXZiSFU3glPnbl3I=; b=o5i0fW3HYvbXSvLDMOgbet0HZIKswaHOPjx6RfNllrLYUo3mjbhJRGhGfH0/9J2Yna F5Crhi3cF8GkjZJP+JD2+z59I230h25LogcPzPl+fzXKVVSy3Filz6BMmm4+imrFgXjc vPhnFyRQ7ExDEEOUoLwoN+fFhiVBos+jggLAdYQJ91BlOFZrLo9M5imZVTNVTgusYM1w 1hf3ITsSSiOojXrEt3xGD+JP1M14X1U9DsTnEyR/IRimBdkaCAyR7/GY0YFt0mCO9YC9 arvs7xKU7fRZIslrfeZ0Mn4BNCAhWa6VgtfXeFOs43tj7D0PwlkKqvzj8V8BSUd5jbHh 91rg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.109.132 with SMTP id l4mr4137431qgf.72.1396488314126; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.21.197 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 21:25:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CACXcFmkU-692xud5+P2QcOGTNABLY6Cv_dauUDcqBhn6NSYiBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com>
To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dsfjdssdfsd/fhgaxwYIpiD4tU_hG8hwVzZM4Js
Subject: [dsfjdssdfsd] what not to do...
X-BeenThere: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The dsfjdssdfsd list provides a venue for discussion of randomness in IETF protocols, for example related to updating RFC 4086." <dsfjdssdfsd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dsfjdssdfsd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 01:25:24 -0000

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>; wrote:

> ... The current draft is also
> missing a discussion of the impact of fork and threading on random
> number generators, which can turn a perfectly working one into
> something utterly broken.

An otherwise fine RNG may also have serious problems when
run in a virtual machine. I think there are a whole lot of tricky
issues there.