Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any plans for drafts or discussions on here?

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 21 January 2014 01:28 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9FA1A0017 for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:28:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UzOBBn8qUYjp for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47921A000E for <dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pauls-mac.home (pool-108-5-148-206.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [108.5.148.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0L18JjE097602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:08:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host pool-108-5-148-206.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [108.5.148.206] claimed to be pauls-mac.home
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHEWaSr3HMuGtQ=vQzuuhkTo2uNpedUTNgmT5NsWRsTfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:28:26 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30316745-8091-46AD-95A1-407757489FF9@vpnc.org>
References: <52DD996F.3040708@cs.tcd.ie> <CAF4+nEHEWaSr3HMuGtQ=vQzuuhkTo2uNpedUTNgmT5NsWRsTfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [dsfjdssdfsd] Any plans for drafts or discussions on here?
X-BeenThere: dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The dsfjdssdfsd list provides a venue for discussion of randomness in IETF protocols, for example related to updating RFC 4086." <dsfjdssdfsd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dsfjdssdfsd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd>, <mailto:dsfjdssdfsd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 01:28:57 -0000

On Jan 20, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been a bit snowed under just recently and this week but I have
> accumulated some changes and suggestions on the randomness requirement
> sod security draft and do plan to do a revision soon.

It would be good to see those revisions. It still feels very wrong for us to be suggesting to application developers that they should be doing their own randomness; they should be asking their OS unless they are experts, and those experts don't need an RFC.

--Paul Hoffman