Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 July 2012 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dsii@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dsii@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE56A21F8550 for <dsii@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.909, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0baeNaAxEmDu for <dsii@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C2A21F854A for <dsii@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo14 with SMTP id fo14so3336110vcb.31 for <dsii@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Q3EDLJ3TTz2JNa+IGbCgzmfoUaqjsX6cStFcBkLHRsw=; b=z7wK/EUtsiH4pb89jhLOOoVOHC7yis7vanHOYEQj3kVT8fJDkjWTp2tAupjAIFPMlj uly6GKFUVPSfcjWEeFMLqhD9wcZohnPzNUUyRdkUj3aUkurCwlkXcAjPPqewfMQfWzIK mpTOTaFD8Hfs8WH/f1VKGU/RR/jq6w1mifey8Cvl4iTl9sCkw6/RUq9CHIZcJytk+mrU RoECHq4wVKv6/EKNnLTt3bHciZhjmdS68jxaZPKY4jf1JBlMwHRq7TsVWPWbarAqqWA/ 3rqD9q1iPmgjrhKWw2W3iOP6vpt+NvezZ5NoGqdmMzRViRQpXL9qiQlrAStOPdpE+D7c 7eUg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.95.110 with SMTP id dj14mr4262435vdb.69.1342798897053; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.170.68 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <50097BF1.1060406@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CA+9kkMBXTxG2FfrgzkQchvyuWg7ukMrJPeGod4oTfq3zeZEa2A@mail.gmail.com> <500977C5.6050302@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+9kkMDx49m2Hy05XOu7YG0469ebdFMHCS6X6=xg9hmaWz0tgg@mail.gmail.com> <50097BF1.1060406@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:41:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBED08ZWKFvZyGbTz5Z-xOcyHaf3ccRG45JQRJ-gEOP0A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: dsii@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: dsii@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dsii.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dsii>, <mailto:dsii-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dsii>
List-Post: <mailto:dsii@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dsii-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsii>, <mailto:dsii-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:40:42 -0000
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > > On 07/20/2012 04:25 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Would this fit in "Current systems" or is it something you'd like us >> to discuss in the context of setting the conceptual framework? > > Dunno to be honest. Maybe neither. More like a "possibly > relevant IETF things" section if you had one, but then > there're probably other possibly relevant IETF things too. > > I'm fine if you don't want to include this or put it into > an "if time" bucket, but I did want to raise it and see > if there's interest or not. > Okay, I'll chat with Beth and we'll find someplace in the agenda to give it some time. regards, Ted > Assuming this list gets more active after the BoF, I can > bring it back up here later as well. > > S. > >> >> Ted >> >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Stephen Farrell >> <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ted, >>> >>> Not quite sure if or how it might fit, but there's another >>> thing [1] I've been working on with some folks that might >>> be relevant here. That's a URI-based name form where the >>> meaty bit of the name is the hash of the thing named. It >>> would certainly not solve all the problems some eventual >>> WG might be tackling, but it might be a useful tool for >>> parts of whatever that might be. >>> >>> Dunno if it'd warrant a chunk of agenda time or not, if >>> so, <=5 mins is fine, just to say the above really and >>> see if that generates interest/questions. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> S. >>> >>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-decade-ni >>> >>> On 07/20/2012 04:03 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: >>>> The BoF agenda, along with the background on BoF aims and context, has >>>> been posted at: >>>> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/agenda/agenda-84-dsii >>>> >>>> Please review the agenda; if you have suggested changes, please send >>>> them to this mailing list. If you are listed as a speaker on the >>>> agenda and plan on using slides, the earlier we have them the better. >>>> They will be posted to the proceedings as soon as we have them, which >>>> will give BoF attendees a chance to review them. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> Ted Hardie >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dsii mailing list >>>> dsii@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsii >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> dsii mailing list >> dsii@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsii >> >>
- [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Ted Hardie
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Larry Lannom
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Ted Hardie
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Ted Hardie
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Ted Hardie
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted John A. Kunze
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Ed Summers
- Re: [dsii] BoF Agenda Posted Leif Johansson