Re: [Dtls-iot] dice wg future work... or time to declare victory?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 26 October 2015 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6911B2E6A for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 06:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfVRaxk9oAQm for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 06:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD031B2E69 for <dtls-iot@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 06:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76271BE47; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:34:20 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcHK9UGMQ6Q0; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:34:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.91] (unknown [86.46.30.221]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D707DBE35; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:34:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1445866459; bh=6xEZ5szP/tAp0l3tkigJ2ekr9jw5Ecme7nWvT2jPwDw=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mNAbMAzWEDU45h9HBxocdUN37euDwEIP0ME/nRW2JwqLGBn550DXRIKNOIdWqnaL4 n/+wTsEBLkoyTuLpjKMgjAwo1ziQS9P9Tz0X2f0RhK0wDIrhHG9HLzM/5/O9uEw7LZ XJyzv5kvFKEnaR7hBUYh8kNQrO6sAePzw9jb5xI0=
To: Shahid Raza <periodic@live.com>
References: <56265F53.7040108@cs.tcd.ie> <5626624A.6050307@gmx.net> <866AAD58-17FA-46B1-B179-C38A5348C69D@arm.com> <5626666F.7080106@gmx.net> <562E0919.80504@sics.se> <562E0EDB.2060108@tzi.org> <BLU437-SMTP8415915F824FD5FF4249DEAC230@phx.gbl> <e4d2565995a94848a445426360fd21bc@DB5PR9001MB0167.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <562E23A6.1000705@cs.tcd.ie> <BLU436-SMTP20234BC822D7A2C32F79939AC230@phx.gbl>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <562E2BDA.3050306@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:34:18 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP20234BC822D7A2C32F79939AC230@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtls-iot/4y-Kjwx0GgjrOq4LiEY2UCNdKJk>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>, "dtls-iot@ietf.org" <dtls-iot@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dtls-iot] dice wg future work... or time to declare victory?
X-BeenThere: dtls-iot@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DTLS for IoT discussion list <dtls-iot.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtls-iot/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtls-iot@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:34:22 -0000


On 26/10/15 13:30, Shahid Raza wrote:
> some fake criticism (unfortunately more loud)

That is also inappropriate. You may not agree with them, but your
disagreeing does not mean that whoever was criticising was being
disingenuous and it is not appropriate (not productive) to try to
denigrate other IETF participants in that manner.

S.