Re: [Dtls-iot] Secure Time (again)

Michael StJohns wrote:
> And for nothing else than a cool acronym, standing up an IOT integration
> working group  (e.g. to have a place to talk about all the pieces and
> how they can come together) might be even a better choice -> Interim
> Designs for the Internet of Things -> idiot.

That acronym is taken -- it stood for "Improving DTLS for the Internet
of Things" -- the WG that then surprisingly became DICE (i.e., the WG
behind this mailing list).

On a more serious note, if you want to have a discourse about IoT
protocol integration issues, T2TRG may be the right place to talk about
this (before we come up with some specific topics for standardization).

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg

Grüße, Carsten