[Dtls-iot] Some interesting drafts to be considered before closing DICE?

Jayaraghavendran k <jayaraghavendran.k@huawei.com> Mon, 02 November 2015 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jayaraghavendran.k@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325E21A036D for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:06:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n6qg_eA6xAeF for <dtls-iot@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE64A1A1A10 for <dtls-iot@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CDK05827; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:06:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMI404-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:06:08 +0000
Received: from SZXEMI501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by SZXEMI404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:02:13 +0800
From: Jayaraghavendran k <jayaraghavendran.k@huawei.com>
To: "dtls-iot@ietf.org" <dtls-iot@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Some interesting drafts to be considered before closing DICE?
Thread-Index: AdEVVRQx8SltMbD/S3yv+b+DrNYykg==
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:02:13 +0000
Message-ID: <8D925D4C0B78EE41857D407022ECD163BFEE9EEB@SZXEMI501-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8D925D4C0B78EE41857D407022ECD163BFEE9EEBSZXEMI501MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtls-iot/V7pN4tuYGHT0BsLCRHKDSGgXySE>
Subject: [Dtls-iot] Some interesting drafts to be considered before closing DICE?
X-BeenThere: dtls-iot@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DTLS for IoT discussion list <dtls-iot.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtls-iot/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtls-iot@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtls-iot>, <mailto:dtls-iot-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:06:14 -0000

Hi All,

I feel the DICE could still consider some drafts like the below one (apart from the group communication ones) before closure? I found this interesting, but not sure why this was not considered. Couldn't find any info in the mailing lists.