IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea

Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com> Sat, 19 July 2014 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <benamar73@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07DE1B280D for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 06:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UlpZ_N036_FO for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 06:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 933641A0AE5 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 06:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id h136so2382596oig.39 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 06:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gMicvGRYNVqreRHVEAEpK334Oj0AabauZKzWBXr+aI4=; b=xpQ1b12+YtqC02hUsB265TVkbuzW09mmoUb1IAc8iWJLde1tRuKaV58xHnd3Je2Kgo mg/Hi2mH6US3muOVLPizmttL84yFxLtm/9VGb5JdiMPV7KhDSrk/PgBq69zTx66iDL0o NpjivD8+bhuAPoaM0GJfh+kC1TpsfOYMnwgUgPb764A5wtdKZauI9yNjQ/iYA8iOegZ8 75twaIUDUizGFzO8OPpAHsnwXsggfDB8tuiHoR+LeCIiRuOQwF0C8OFYn+Grz8AnWE8X J1mVEjv/otFdCo6vs38Jr2Ja8UdfcT2Nksm43wnBpSL+1Lx2tpECYDdWYoQCzdhQab2F 8hfw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.81.200 with SMTP id c8mr17062313oby.35.1405775904016; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 06:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.133.165 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 06:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHxHggd-FDtBsnLEtFQ_PMmOMX-qfsu9r00bDUnqK4c=OZdPQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1405740483446.13356@surrey.ac.uk> <CAHxHggd-FDtBsnLEtFQ_PMmOMX-qfsu9r00bDUnqK4c=OZdPQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:18:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMugd_WhX=EXLV7c2d9MC5T8XgmzX3BSAG_OJfJOktfPEyrfWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com>
To: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e4e3e648db704fe8bb5cb"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/6irAOr1Iu0E4lY3dKnabWHaJhFA
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dtn-interest <dtn-interest@irtf.org>, dtn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTNWG proposal is a terribly bad idea
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:18:26 -0000

+1 Vint

*Best wishes*
*نبيل بنعمرو*
*Nabil Benamar*
*Moulay Ismail University.*
*Meknes. Morocco*
*nabilbenamar.com <http://nabilbenamar.com>*


On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> wrote:

> ok, you don't need to participate in the WG if it is formed, Lloyd.
>
> vint
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:28 PM, <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> I'm not going to be attending the DTNWG BOF remotely, as it's
>> at 2am my local time - but I'd just like to point out, as I said in
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn/current/msg00026.html
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn/current/msg00054.html
>>
>> that I think that having an IETF workgroup push the technically
>> flawed Bundle Protocol through on standards track, after years
>> of poor development and unfixed problems across two IRTF research
>> groups, is a really terribly bad idea that does not benefit the IETF
>> community, and does not benefit work on delay-tolerant networking
>> or ad-hoc networking in general.
>>
>> So, I am not in favour of the proposed DTNWG being formed.
>>
>> Enjoy Toronto.
>>
>> Lloyd Wood
>> http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/dtn
>> _______________________________________________
>> dtn-interest mailing list
>> dtn-interest@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email