Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check
"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Thu, 29 July 2010 16:52 UTC
Received: from ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.122]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6TGqtNH006349 for <dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:52:55 -0700
Received: from ndjsppt05.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt05.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.104]) by ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E207D0064; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:52:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub02-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.161]) by ndjsppt05.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6TGqtkZ029574; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:52:55 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC07.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.178]) by ndjshub02.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.161]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:52:55 -0500
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: Daniel Ellard <dellard@bbn.com>, "dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net" <dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:52:24 -0500
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] Document status check
Thread-Index: AcsvPbXAK3/22JxDSlWr3sTN9LQCfwAABx5A
Message-ID: <7BBFF2424089F04FB7D62F800895E2B629AA43037A@NDJSSCC07.ndc.nasa.gov>
References: <4C519756.1080501@cs.tcd.ie> <4C51AC12.8020508@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C51AC12.8020508@bbn.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011, 1.0.148, 0.0.0000 definitions=2010-07-29_08:2010-07-29, 2010-07-29, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by maillists.intel-research.net id o6TGqtNH006349
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:52:56 -0000
I concur for TCP. The current UDP Convergence layer is rather limiting but is implemented in most if not all DTN implementations. I would rather UDP not have all the limitations it does. A better UDP convergence layer that doesn't limit one to 64kbyte packets would be preferred. - Will >-----Original Message----- >From: dtn-interest-bounces@maillists.intel-research.net [mailto:dtn- >interest-bounces@maillists.intel-research.net] On Behalf Of Daniel >Ellard >Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:28 PM >To: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net >Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check > >On 7/29/10 10:59 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> As usual, there're a bunch of I-Ds with dtnrg in their >> name, so I'd just like to get a sense of the state-of-play >> for these. Feel free to reply to the list, or just Kevin >> and I. >>... >> If you think the draft should live, but no longer have >> cycles to work on it, then that's interesting too - we >> may be able to recruit some new authors. >> ... >> DTNRG expired: >>... >> 19 Nov 2008 draft-irtf-dtnrg-udp-clayer >> 03 Nov 2008 draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer > >I am not an author or custodian of either of these, but am >willing to help keep them moving forward. We (BBN anyway, >but I suspect nearly everyone else) use these all the time >and they should be moved forward to RFC status instead of >just being de facto standards. > >-Dan > >-- >Daniel Ellard, Ph.D. >Senior Scientist, Network Research >BBN Technologies >10 Moulton Street >Cambridge, MA 02138 >dellard@bbn.com >_______________________________________________ >dtn-interest mailing list >dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net >http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Symington, Susan F.
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Michael Demmer
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Joerg Ott
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check L.Wood
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Daniel Ellard
- [dtn-interest] Document status check Stephen Farrell