Re: [dtn-interest] Multicast routing

Elwyn Davies <elwynd@folly.org.uk> Mon, 02 June 2014 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <elwynd@folly.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320461A0357 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.811
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.811 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LH--75uet8VH for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from b.painless.aa.net.uk (b.painless.aa.net.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:0:30::51bb:1e34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8101A035E for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brdgfw.folly.org.uk ([81.187.254.242] helo=[192.168.0.131]) by b.painless.aa.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <elwynd@folly.org.uk>) id 1WrUX3-0005Bw-QW; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:52:18 +0100
Message-ID: <538C9DAC.8000707@folly.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:52:12 +0100
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@folly.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Prof. Marcelo" <prof.marceloguido@gmail.com>
References: <CAEFUMGN1jmbMGqfEnNDC-sG1vfXLD+ynrXneztapFaE1c86-YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEFUMGN1jmbMGqfEnNDC-sG1vfXLD+ynrXneztapFaE1c86-YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040303060308050708080602"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/Ayx1rbgok65IWHqMY5Q4F4UrZlM
Cc: "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Multicast routing
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: elwynd@folly.org.uk
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:52:33 -0000

Hi.

Attached are the bibtex refs for a selection of DTN multicast routing 
papers, some of which are more recent than 2009.

Part of the issue is that we have never really sorted out multicast 
addressing in DTN.  In principle EIDs can be multi-point but the DTN2 
code doesn't handle the multi-point case in any sensible way.

I looked at how to handle this when implementing the netinf ICN protocol 
over the BP and came up with some ideas that actually hark back to the 
service type addressing/naming that was discussed in DTNRG.  See 
draft-irtf-dtnrg-dtn-uri-scheme-00.txt and a presentation at the DTNRG 
meeting at Google in 2009 (see DTNRG slides at IETF 74 for web ref).  
There was also intentional naming - see draft-pbasu-dtnrg-naming-00.tx 
and presentations at IETF 65, 71, Google meeting before IETF 74, 75.

Unfortunately very little of this has been implemented.

Regards,
Elwyn

On 02/06/14 03:30, Prof. Marcelo wrote:
> Hello everybody, how are you?
>
> I donĀ“t know if here is the best place to this question, but I think 
> here it's! Somebody could help me? I'd like to know what i the state 
> of art in multicast routing for DTN? I read some papers, like surveys 
> and performance comparison, but all of then date from 2009. Nowadays 
> what are you using for multicast routing in DTN?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Marcelo Guido
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest