Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check

Hans Kruse <kruse@ohiou.edu> Thu, 29 July 2010 18:02 UTC

Received: from mx2.oit.ohio.edu (mx2.oit.ohio.edu [132.235.51.19]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6TI27Vh009797 for <dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:02:08 -0700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnkFAPZeUUyE6wiX/2dsb2JhbACBRJFxjUa3f4hkgwqCLgSIeQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.55,282,1278302400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="50666405"
Received: from oak3a.cats.ohiou.edu (HELO oak.cats.ohiou.edu) ([132.235.8.151]) by smtpout2.oit.ohio.edu with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2010 14:02:07 -0400
Received: from lin4.its.ohiou.edu (lin4.its.ohiou.edu [132.235.232.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by oak.cats.ohiou.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o6TI1bXE1974778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:01:37 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <60A03A02-3BE5-4F28-A0E9-528A0689FA3B@ohiou.edu>
From: Hans Kruse <kruse@ohiou.edu>
To: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <7BBFF2424089F04FB7D62F800895E2B629AA43037A@NDJSSCC07.ndc.nasa.gov>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-4--675897010"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:01:37 -0400
References: <4C519756.1080501@cs.tcd.ie> <4C51AC12.8020508@bbn.com> <7BBFF2424089F04FB7D62F800895E2B629AA43037A@NDJSSCC07.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net" <dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:02:08 -0000

We can already fragment bundles and use LTP to transmit multiple (LTP)  
frames per bundle.   I am not sure it makes sense to create another  
fragmentation mechanism.....

On Jul 29, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0) wrote:

> I concur for TCP.
>
> The current UDP Convergence layer is rather limiting but is  
> implemented in most if not all DTN implementations.  I would rather  
> UDP not have all the limitations it does.  A better UDP convergence  
> layer that doesn't limit one to 64kbyte packets would be preferred.
>
> - Will
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dtn-interest-bounces@maillists.intel-research.net [mailto:dtn-
>> interest-bounces@maillists.intel-research.net] On Behalf Of Daniel
>> Ellard
>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 12:28 PM
>> To: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
>> Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check
>>
>> On 7/29/10 10:59 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As usual, there're a bunch of I-Ds with dtnrg in their
>>> name, so I'd just like to get a sense of the state-of-play
>>> for these. Feel free to reply to the list, or just Kevin
>>> and I.
>>> ...
>>> If you think the draft should live, but no longer have
>>> cycles to work on it, then that's interesting too - we
>>> may be able to recruit some new authors.
>>> ...
>>> DTNRG expired:
>>> ...
>>> 19 Nov 2008  	draft-irtf-dtnrg-udp-clayer
>>> 03 Nov 2008  	draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer
>>
>> I am not an author or custodian of either of these, but am
>> willing to help keep them moving forward.  We (BBN anyway,
>> but I suspect nearly everyone else) use these all the time
>> and they should be moved forward to RFC status instead of
>> just being de facto standards.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Ellard, Ph.D.
>> Senior Scientist, Network Research
>> BBN Technologies
>> 10 Moulton Street
>> Cambridge, MA 02138
>> dellard@bbn.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> dtn-interest mailing list
>> dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
>> http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
> http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest

Hans Kruse, Professor
J. Warren McClure School of Information and Telecommunication Systems
Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer  
Science
292 Lindley Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701
740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax