Re: [dtn-interest] FW: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08

there is a lot more TCP and IP network readily available than others so,
statistically, this is not a surprise. I anticipate that LTE may prove
another supporting environment. Of course, there continues to be work in
deep space such as the latest laser comm tests to/from the moon at 600 Mb/s.

vint

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:

> Vint,
>
> the impression I've gained is that most bundle protocol use is over TCP -
> that is,
> rather than being a compatibility mechanism, TCP is the dominant transport
> for the
> bundle protocol.
>
> Are there any statistics or metrics of use that can shed light here?
>
> thanks
>
> Lloyd Wood
> http://about.me/lloydwood
> ________________________________________
> From: Vint Cerf [vint@google.com]
> Sent: 25 February 2014 08:51
> To: Wood L  Dr (Electronic Eng)
> Cc: dtn-interest
> Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] FW: Results of IETF-conflict review for
> draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
>
> Lloyd,
> This makes it possible to support applications end to end over DTN
> including the Internet.
> It is a compatibility mechanism.
>
> vint
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:23 AM, <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk<mailto:
> l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>> wrote:
> Congratulations to  DTNRG on reaching the below milestone in getting
> this draft well on the way to being published.
>
> It's been a long delay since draft-demmer-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-00.txt in
> October
> 2006, but defining how the bundle protocol is carried over TCP will go a
> long
> way to improving support for networked communications under the very
> difficult disrupted and delay-tolerant network conditions when TCP break...
> um. Ah.
>
> Lloyd Wood
> http://about.me/lloydwood
> ________________________________________
> From: IETF-Announce [ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:
> ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of The IESG [
> iesg-secretary@ietf.org<mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>]
> Sent: 24 February 2014 17:40
> To: Lars Eggert; draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer@tools.ietf.org<mailto:
> draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer@tools.ietf.org>; jo@netlab.tkk.fi<mailto:
> jo@netlab.tkk.fi>
> Cc: iana@iana.org<mailto:iana@iana.org>; The IESG; ietf-announce@ietf.org
> <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
>
> The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
> consistent with RFC5742.
>
>
> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Delay Tolerant
> Networking TCP Convergence Layer Protocol'
> <draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08.txt> as an Experimental RFC.
>
>
> The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
> and IETF work.
>
>
>
> The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
> datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
> merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
> ballot and the history log.
>
> The IESG review is documented at:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer/
>
> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer/
>
> The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743
>
> Thank you,
>
> The IESG Secretary
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>
>