Re: [dtn-interest] FW: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08

Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> Tue, 25 February 2014 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <vint@google.com>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31071A0668 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:43:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j_s-nA5xFN7F for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22a.google.com (mail-bk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3921A0665 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id mx12so142756bkb.29 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:43:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/xkdoWO0iV8j9lknNj8VkeiLv3hkCD17+HSUYAfxJUw=; b=SZxhi4ngrYg5a1lEqcmUUA9i1k70bgm4Ebnr2i1CvmmEEDs/Wfz2TD9kIrbMpG9yO7 aaXNktFVmwMPr74vsoTuOMaWZIlFT96nwWnIBti9IG2G1gPCjp0OmP9oOfV5VDkGfDI3 me7DlbuWp1ImYyVxvxZUtrU04mv0AXabbCgYCYelCdjB4E5Fh2YSjaZWEUTLqtMHXe+Z YzrFGu/aKuRihc1umVuqb2QCGj1TLXWvY6YGOCyS2B5lqSrjgYB+Vwwer3VC1c++Jz66 chg5/fnVXLfZiO+HF2zUFphQZSUIsKnbFN7G08g4nyc2LvZgKv+5TEw+U+BVohD4BBUw udKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/xkdoWO0iV8j9lknNj8VkeiLv3hkCD17+HSUYAfxJUw=; b=HQsLrq5U4+ybGtqj5W1owdd1di8KXO59CilKGsdOvmH8j9ynJCYWrPAXFsLJnWdiow KG9E2ctVXGHVH5L+M/2/1giib3dlocGFHqiI9GF+EifYgM6qQopyFBpIo1lGvYiYQpdq sDfyjW9LQODRUYzru3S4Lz3leHnTSrV4xKP8diy6iCEyBlAIWD2rnsFcAV2LI/QAjL89 cJrUBiASffQoBjuJnEb8SWlukQ1fZu7zW8QbjWbPW4/mTUFRAT8m3bUiynyNn3H6pXVO KX+IsKx92SAqh7J9R36r2sS6j4IICZobQC8cRZFn6LEdI731IFSCneTpBYB+S4Im8Yj4 /yNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmQAJs8j5sIZARINWKk+RV/YMZA2i426L9kU+GeBQQ8ldTHGwWWqjH9yegP2rZ0fTuj4592mEQs9plUzW3DgVhTiVUdg4wXpc3/VWKB3Ur2R3NZekuH1c3THCrM/e+tOA4S5GIS3/ynH4ajet1lFLnOlV4i9R4AnAvCMPXK68G9tiwxVYsxHrpEa5Zp3PS1/qvjADHEGIOUcMpvXnrDuIKDcq43tg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.76.7 with SMTP id a7mr1348858bkk.17.1393321382476; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:43:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.33.7 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:43:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E633472F@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <20140224174005.29954.4505.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E633472E@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <CAHxHggfuA39yP4wvwxC8Gd3waY_XEvRhhHdKJgUzakN-rNWb6A@mail.gmail.com> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E633472F@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 04:43:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHxHggeQ701aecnu15tcDsMOLboCVFzHaTqendyb2WmrmV+3vg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
To: "l.wood@surrey.ac.uk" <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb03bea0ffc6404f337ea23
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/O6txIecewfhFug0aqAQT8SxwZxo
Cc: dtn-interest <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] FW: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:43:07 -0000

there is a lot more TCP and IP network readily available than others so,
statistically, this is not a surprise. I anticipate that LTE may prove
another supporting environment. Of course, there continues to be work in
deep space such as the latest laser comm tests to/from the moon at 600 Mb/s.

vint



On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:

> Vint,
>
> the impression I've gained is that most bundle protocol use is over TCP -
> that is,
> rather than being a compatibility mechanism, TCP is the dominant transport
> for the
> bundle protocol.
>
> Are there any statistics or metrics of use that can shed light here?
>
> thanks
>
> Lloyd Wood
> http://about.me/lloydwood
> ________________________________________
> From: Vint Cerf [vint@google.com]
> Sent: 25 February 2014 08:51
> To: Wood L  Dr (Electronic Eng)
> Cc: dtn-interest
> Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] FW: Results of IETF-conflict review for
> draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
>
> Lloyd,
> This makes it possible to support applications end to end over DTN
> including the Internet.
> It is a compatibility mechanism.
>
> vint
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:23 AM, <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk<mailtomailto:
> l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>> wrote:
> Congratulations to  DTNRG on reaching the below milestone in getting
> this draft well on the way to being published.
>
> It's been a long delay since draft-demmer-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-00.txt in
> October
> 2006, but defining how the bundle protocol is carried over TCP will go a
> long
> way to improving support for networked communications under the very
> difficult disrupted and delay-tolerant network conditions when TCP break...
> um. Ah.
>
> Lloyd Wood
> http://about.me/lloydwood
> ________________________________________
> From: IETF-Announce [ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org<mailtolto:
> ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of The IESG [
> iesg-secretary@ietf.org<mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org>]
> Sent: 24 February 2014 17:40
> To: Lars Eggert; draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer@tools.ietf.org<mailtolto:
> draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer@tools.ietf.org>gt;; jo@netlab.tkk.fi<mailtolto:
> jo@netlab.tkk.fi>
> Cc: iana@iana.org<mailto:iana@iana.org>; The IESG; ietf-announce@ietf.org
> <mailto:ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
>
> The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
> consistent with RFC5742.
>
>
> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Delay Tolerant
> Networking TCP Convergence Layer Protocol'
> <draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08.txt> as an Experimental RFC.
>
>
> The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
> and IETF work.
>
>
>
> The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
> datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
> merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
> ballot and the history log.
>
> The IESG review is documented at:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer/
>
> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer/
>
> The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743
>
> Thank you,
>
> The IESG Secretary
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>
>