Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing 'em...(author response required)

[Keiichi SHIMA <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

08-Nov-2010,draft-uehara-dtnrg-decentralized-probe-message
08-Nov-2010,draft-uehara-dtnrg-decentralized-probe-transport

7->7 (or 6, depends on the progress).  We will revise these documents to fit the approaches and protocols defined in the DTNRG.  We plan to publish revised documents once or twice before next IETF.

---
Keiichi SHIMA
Research Laboratory, IIJ Innovation Institute  <[e-mail]>
WIDE Project <[e-mail]>





On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:43 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> 
> My guesses for things for which I'm an author:
> 
> - draft-irtf-bundle-age-block, 6->5 once someone
> writes code, maybe 6 months or so, I'll help
> 
> - draft-irtf-dtnrg-sec-overview, 6->5 once the
> BSP is actually an RFC, maybe take two revs to
> be done, I'll work on i
> 
> - draft-farrell-dtnrg-bpq, 7-> 6, that can
> happen now I think if folks are ok with it, I'll
> work on it (we're starting to code it up now)
> 
> - draft-farrell-dtnrg-km, 9->8, I've tried a
> few times, but no-one seems to have cycles to
> do work on this
> 
> S.
> 
> PS: for documents with >1 author, its ok to get
>> 1 response (more is better:-)
> 
> On 15/11/10 20:32, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> All (or almost all) those DTN related I-Ds are presumably
>> intended to become RFCs. There's a big bunch so I want to
>> put some manners on the set, in terms of when we plan to
>> get done with each.
>> 
>> I've sorted the on-line list into various states, some of
>> which I've just invented but all of which should be obvious
>> for anyone familiar with IETF or IRTF processes. The
>> full list is below.
>> 
>> Can document authors please reply to this mail with your
>> plans for state changes for your documents? If I hear nothing,
>> I'm gonna treat 'em as OBE or "probably dead."
>> 
>> In each case, please clearly say which I-D, (just give
>> the name), which state change (e.g. "7->6") you think
>> is next, when you think that could happen (e.g. "in
>> about two months") with realism being appreciated, and
>> if the new state is not OBE or dead, (i.e. 8, 9 or
>> 10), then please also give an assurance that you have
>> the time available for moving the document forward.
>> 
>> Negative information is also welcome, e.g. saying
>> "would like draft-foo to go from 6->5, think that'd
>> take a month or so but I don't have time, so
>> suggest transitioning from 6->8"
>> 
>> And since its a long list, if you spot a plain error,
>> just reply with a suggested fix.
>> 
>> I'd like all responses that imply future work for
>> me in the near future by the end of next week please.
>> That basically means anything about which I hear
>> nothing before November 28 will be treated by me
>> as being in one of states 8,9 or 10.
>> 
>> Once I get all that, I'll try see if there's a
>> sensible bunch to send to the IRSG at once, of if
>> we just do 'em one at a time.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen.
>> DTNRG-related I-D status, 2010-11-15
>> [e-mail]
>> Format is <last-rev-date,I-D-name>
>> 
>> 1. RFC already
>> 
>> 25-Jun-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-extensions
>> 25-Jun-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-motivation
>> 25-Jun-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp
>> 05-Jul-2007,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-spec
>> 15-Dec-2006,draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch
>> 
>> 2. RFC editor queue
>> 
>> Nothing
>> 
>> 3. IESG "end-run" review
>> (Actually, I've not yet asked, gotta assemble the
>> electronic paperwork in the next few days.)
>> 
>> 11-Nov-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe
>> 25-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-prophet
>> 25-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-iana-bp-registries
>> 11-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv
>> 13-Sep-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-security
>> 08-Jul-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-metadata-block
>> 
>> 4. IRSG review
>> 
>> Nothing
>> 
>> 5. DTNRG "last-call-like-state"
>> 
>> Nothing
>> 
>> 6. work-in-progress, "accepted" by RG
>> 
>> 14-Nov-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-checksum
>> 11-Nov-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ecos
>> 25-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-age-block
>> 17-May-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-previous-hop-block
>> 08-Mar-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ipnd
>> 09-Feb-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ding-network-management
>> 05-Oct-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-retrans-block
>> 12-Aug-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-divert
>> 12-Aug-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-encapsulation
>> 31-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-dtn-uri-scheme
>> 09-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-sec-overview
>> 09-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-eidrefs
>> 09-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-metadata-conf
>> 19-Nov-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-udp-clayer
>> 03-Nov-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer
>> 
>> 7. work-in-progress (individual)
>> 
>> 14-Nov-2010,draft-wood-dtnrg-saratoga
>> 14-Nov-2010,draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery
>> 08-Nov-2010,draft-uehara-dtnrg-decentralized-probe-message
>> 08-Nov-2010,draft-uehara-dtnrg-decentralized-probe-transport
>> 08-Nov-2010,draft-farrell-dtnrg-bpq
>> 20-Aug-2010,draft-burleigh-dtnrg-ltpcl
>> 09-Jul-2010,draft-burleigh-dtnrg-cgr
>> 28-Feb-2010,draft-fall-dtnrg-schl
>> 27-Feb-2010,draft-mcmahon-dtnrg-dtn-edp
>> 26-Oct-2009,draft-davies-dtnrg-uri-find
>> 
>> 8. Overtaken by events (OBE)
>> 
>> Nothing
>> 
>> 9. Probably dead (maybe worth reviving?)
>> 
>> 22-May-2009,draft-pbasu-dtnrg-naming
>> 19-Jun-2007,draft-farrell-dtnrg-km
>> 17-Apr-2007,draft-kutscher-dtnrg-uni-clayer
>> 18-Nov-2007,draft-wyllie-dtnrg-badisc
>> 13-Nov-2007,draft-ott-dtnrg-dtn-appl
>> 26-May-2006,draft-eddy-dtnrg-eid
>> 
>> 10. Almost certainly dead (just checking)
>> 
>> 22-Mar-2010,draft-blanchet-dtnrg-iana-registries
>> 24-Feb-2010,draft-ellard-dtnrg-reltime-htl
>> 23-Nov-2009,draft-farrell-dtnrg-alt-time
>> 12-Aug-2009,draft-symington-dtnrg-bundle-multicast-custodial
>> 06-Jun-2009,draft-ivancic-dtnrg-network-management-reqs
>> 08-Feb-2008,draft-symington-dtnrg-bundle-metadata-block
>> 14-Aug-2007,draft-eddy-dtnrg-checksum
>> 29-May-2007,draft-lindgren-dtnrg-prophet
>> 18-Oct-2006,draft-demmer-dtnrg-tcp-clayer
>> 13-Oct-2006,draft-symington-dtnrg-bundle-retrans-block
>> 27-Oct-2003,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ipn-bundle-xfer
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dtn-interest mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest