Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check
Daniel Ellard <dellard@bbn.com> Thu, 29 July 2010 16:28 UTC
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6TGS4sF005027 for <dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:28:04 -0700
Received: from senshu.bbn.com ([128.89.80.164]:50528) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <dellard@bbn.com>) id 1OeVxj-000BPr-R5; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:28:03 -0400
Message-ID: <4C51AC12.8020508@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:28:02 -0400
From: Daniel Ellard <dellard@bbn.com>
Organization: BBN Technologies
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
References: <4C519756.1080501@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4C519756.1080501@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:28:04 -0000
On 7/29/10 10:59 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hi all, > > As usual, there're a bunch of I-Ds with dtnrg in their > name, so I'd just like to get a sense of the state-of-play > for these. Feel free to reply to the list, or just Kevin > and I. >... > If you think the draft should live, but no longer have > cycles to work on it, then that's interesting too - we > may be able to recruit some new authors. > ... > DTNRG expired: >... > 19 Nov 2008 draft-irtf-dtnrg-udp-clayer > 03 Nov 2008 draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer I am not an author or custodian of either of these, but am willing to help keep them moving forward. We (BBN anyway, but I suspect nearly everyone else) use these all the time and they should be moved forward to RFC status instead of just being de facto standards. -Dan -- Daniel Ellard, Ph.D. Senior Scientist, Network Research BBN Technologies 10 Moulton Street Cambridge, MA 02138 dellard@bbn.com
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Symington, Susan F.
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Michael Demmer
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Joerg Ott
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check L.Wood
- Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check Daniel Ellard
- [dtn-interest] Document status check Stephen Farrell