[dtn-interest] FW: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08

<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Tue, 25 February 2014 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5271A0547 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:23:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hC-COt1rIgVh for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904FE1A042C for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] by server-15.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id C9/8D-19263-AE25C035; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:23:06 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-217.messagelabs.com!1393316585!14498827!1
X-Originating-IP: []
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 14571 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2014 08:23:06 -0000
Received: from exht011p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk) ( by server-3.tower-217.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2014 08:23:06 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([]) by EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk ([]) with mapi; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:23:05 +0000
From: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
To: <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:23:04 +0000
Thread-Topic: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
Thread-Index: Ac8xh6Him/fHgGNdScaa6xkPt1CMWAAekt1K
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E633472E@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <20140224174005.29954.4505.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140224174005.29954.4505.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/dRhPh9grnf2o9uN2R0K1tRFfBwA
Subject: [dtn-interest] FW: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:23:10 -0000

Congratulations to  DTNRG on reaching the below milestone in getting
this draft well on the way to being published.

It's been a long delay since draft-demmer-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-00.txt in October
2006, but defining how the bundle protocol is carried over TCP will go a long
way to improving support for networked communications under the very
difficult disrupted and delay-tolerant network conditions when TCP break...
um. Ah.

Lloyd Wood
From: IETF-Announce [ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG [iesg-secretary@ietf.org]
Sent: 24 February 2014 17:40
To: Lars Eggert; draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer@tools.ietf.org; jo@netlab.tkk.fi
Cc: iana@iana.org; The IESG; ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08

The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08
consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Delay Tolerant
Networking TCP Convergence Layer Protocol'
<draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer-08.txt> as an Experimental RFC.

The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document
and IETF work.

The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the
datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they
merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the
ballot and the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:

A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is:

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary