[dtn-interest] [IBR-DTN]

Leonel Gaspar Soares <leonelgasparsoares@gmail.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <leonelgasparsoares@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E30D127077 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KddjI1Ay0s7 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA76124B0A for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j64so63674533vkg.3 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=A0lUidd9wjVULNSH1fIeVTiBMYkXZh5Ax+f4xq10xb0=; b=o0WZmaRnCyNBiQaBI83qZJPKTG7JUYUvRZtehqAPOM70uWHQnvBpY/6UVG3BZh5xIx cziOs3zvok5H2OH8VaaiyboXcA5z1KAdWCpDxlYv8vTx6Io+3Y65MiefuK7TXT+Jq09c d/XVHud3Ai2BUcJBgxqznsbbZaggdnNGgN+YAceNKlj/hpPl547bxZGr+6WpcjDsKxQn BFSJYz4jloFmhyLsKlfUJ0QYdGzhRQ5MteH5fPCrLVmIw+6psqolzj2xespklp+vCORG tq5FR0aWPufMkCck5zzqgXTyO9ZEgXHPzXnFKjtu/WrMeWp8bvcowIXyLMJP/N8/p9g8 IfYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=A0lUidd9wjVULNSH1fIeVTiBMYkXZh5Ax+f4xq10xb0=; b=WxjDf32Dcez4Tx1eJeGC5rCNHIVPmTX77mShpIJI+DoiFqLMK5MJvFrjfxbShoYkDR C5/ROnHaZF0ZMP1cMaJOvr+pO71J1S/lVR3mnpyGnQpdAMbKlNeIIkpRjS/mRPYxc3UD VyNUzAMC3uuefWBGltRqKXm0yIq5GyKps813lI3jaybRP4Pz8tEKG2NLVL5jEuIAByCX Rs34CsvjDZHE5WLVS+ViulObeeqGXdmDvIuR4aziObVqw8nVSgm0nM6/k2YWXbKRUK0C GGuWF3CmcWY1t2b4T7feOJi5cQLVQ5wxLoz4MVPflUwuaPc3+QBGrjBIVwWvDJAlMF4z jX/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0eOR8CZzsiJ6fvrdQPd4Dvzcn34d6+aqTPXBSXSAO4+x6XvnsANXOyT+sgTNhpCzJhLpmfnRCE7pHptQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.136.210 with SMTP id k201mr12999638vkd.78.1490050440310; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.32.165 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Leonel Gaspar Soares <leonelgasparsoares@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:53:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CABvAxfsCOHgaPzo+NZSpOw4R3sNc0uycU5GZ5uJgz+urM=Uw5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114125143137aa054b316763"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/jsSyRfklLMjSa4ai9kPe7PN3L0o>
Subject: [dtn-interest] [IBR-DTN]
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:54:03 -0000

Hello, I'm currently studding IBR-DTN in OpenWrt, and would like to know
how does fragmentation work in this platform. How can fragment of bundle
size be configurated?
Also, experimenting with different nodes (master in time announcement and
slaves) I have the impression that slave nodes produce bundles with
timestamp 1 Jan 2000, and these are always accepted, by other slaves or
master. After synchronization, slaves transmit bundles with master date,
but if the master goes away, new slaves will transmit bundles with
timestamp 1 Jan 2000, accepted by other slaves,witch in turn transmit
bundles with timestamp, say 20 March 2017 22h30, and these are accepted by
the new slaves! Do slaves accept all bundle timestamps? Bundles emited by
slaves accepted by all?
Thanks