Re: [dtn-interest] Multicast routing

"Burleigh, Scott C (312G)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Mon, 02 June 2014 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A911A021F for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fq_TWl7gqPfR for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (sentrion3.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.139.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BB31A021A for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (ap-ehub-sp02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.149]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id s52F3q7W027481 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits) verified NO); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:03:52 -0700
Received: from AP-EMBX-SP40.RES.AD.JPL ([169.254.7.156]) by ap-ehub-sp02.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::dd85:7b07:1e36:7e3c%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:03:52 -0700
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (312G)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: "Prof. Marcelo" <prof.marceloguido@gmail.com>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] Multicast routing
Thread-Index: AQHPfgqZ3g2HBCyhq0WVqATziSFSo5td5inQ
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:03:51 +0000
Message-ID: <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B423B4EA4@ap-embx-sp40.RES.AD.JPL>
References: <CAEFUMGN1jmbMGqfEnNDC-sG1vfXLD+ynrXneztapFaE1c86-YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEFUMGN1jmbMGqfEnNDC-sG1vfXLD+ynrXneztapFaE1c86-YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [128.149.137.26]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B423B4EA4apembxsp40RESAD_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/l5WuBcvhL9V0scXThIIq3DhgIKE
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Multicast routing
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:04:00 -0000

I think there are some relevant research papers in the proceedings of 2012 IEEE INFOCOM and the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

There’s a multicast mechanism in ION that runs very well, but it’s not standard and it only works for nodes that can be identified by “ipn”-scheme EIDs.  The spec is in an expired Internet Draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-burleigh-dtnrg-imc/.

Scott

From: dtn-interest [mailto:dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Prof. Marcelo
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2014 7:30 PM
To: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Subject: [dtn-interest] Multicast routing

Hello everybody, how are you?
I don´t know if here is the best place to this question, but I think here it's! Somebody could help me? I'd like to know what i the state of art in multicast routing for DTN? I read some papers, like surveys and performance comparison, but all of then date from 2009. Nowadays what are you using for multicast routing in DTN?
Thanks!
Marcelo Guido