Re: [dtn-interest] Hello from Brazil

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 03 February 2014 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63351A025D for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:46:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFa06ll0W86k for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5EB1A015D for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:46:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55597BE29; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 22:46:49 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J63TppXBP+GJ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 22:46:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.10] (unknown [86.45.58.86]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D03BBE25; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 22:46:48 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <52F01C58.5010700@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:46:48 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
References: <CAEFUMGMyi100CdyB-+NmBV8_zahnsMMx_xEwdMPvRGx+dkz1LQ@mail.gmail.com> <5EE81C5C4CFFF4418C5EAD12F49D64EE4C19CD73@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181BF523@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>, <5EE81C5C4CFFF4418C5EAD12F49D64EE4C19DEBB@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG> <329D879C76FDD04AAAE84BB1D89B397008595BD760@aplesfreedom.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <329D879C76FDD04AAAE84BB1D89B397008595BD760@aplesfreedom.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] Hello from Brazil
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:46:53 -0000

Just in case it helps speed things up...(given that the RG
are going quite slowly these days;-)

On 02/03/2014 06:36 PM, Birrane, Edward J. wrote:
> I believe that SBSP, when promoted to RFC, should be a replacement
> for BSP as defined in RFC6257.

We don't need to think in terms of replacing or obsoleting.
So long as we're in IRTF-land, these are all experimental
RFCs. Another experiment is just fine.

So SBSP or whatever does not have to try fully replace BSP,
(nor justify doing so), just include the bits you want.

S.