[dtn-interest] (no subject)
"OBIORAH FREDRICK" <obiorah@gmail.com> Thu, 22 November 2007 19:36 UTC
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lAMJamuT017469 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:36:48 -0800
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c38so2330966wra for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:36:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.133.15 with SMTP id g15mr2487774wfd.1195760207023; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.165.8 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <746f0d310711221136h46f88b9bj32253318b035cee1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:36:46 +0100
From: OBIORAH FREDRICK <obiorah@gmail.com>
To: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_27508_20505344.1195760207035"
Subject: [dtn-interest] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:36:50 -0000
Dear moderator, I am an MSc student at Delft university of technology currently working on DTN. I would like to know where and how to put some of my questions I need clarification on. If this is an avenue for such, then my question is: I am considering investigating the use RUDP and coding techniques in routing messages in DTN. since RUDP is almost similar to TCP with less complexity, and also RUDP is yet to be made a formal standard, Is this approach relevant, especially with respect to real world deployment of DTN. Thanks Fredrick
- RE: [dtn-interest] (no subject) Nabeel Ahmed
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) Piero Cornice
- Re: [dtn-interest] (no subject) Evan Jones
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) Matthew Robert Seligman
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) Symington, Susan F.
- Re: [dtn-interest] RDP (was: "(no subject)") weddy
- Re: [dtn-interest] (no subject) Stephen Farrell
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) OBIORAH FREDRICK
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) Golnaz Honarpisheh
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) savanted1©
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) M.Bhutta
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) 周欣欣
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) savanted1©
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) Ep Yang
- [dtn-interest] (no subject) Nadir Shah