IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG energy levels?

"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-LCA0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Fri, 18 March 2016 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2292312D8FE for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8SXHVITU9svg for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsvnpf102.ndc.nasa.gov (NDJSVNPF102.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CE012D66C for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.199]) by ndjsvnpf102.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A294002523; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:59:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from NDJSCHT112.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjscht112-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.212]) by ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with ESMTP id u2IFxXIA030017; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:59:33 -0500
Received: from NDJSMBX203.ndc.nasa.gov ([169.254.2.228]) by NDJSCHT112.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.212]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:59:33 -0500
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-LCA0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] DTNRG energy levels?
Thread-Index: AQHRgS8pyoZfEtJAG0uxKg5AbIw7sw==
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:59:32 +0000
Message-ID: <D3119D3F.40ABF%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122
x-originating-ip: [139.88.111.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <ADF2E270882E274D80F90423065F2DAB@mail.nasa.gov>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-03-18_08:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/oXrYdSXyFIAYRQOO0p42J1sk3E8>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTNRG energy levels?
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:59:36 -0000

IMHO, ICN has overtaken DTN - particularly since DTNRG was so focused on
just the Bundling protocol. Perhaps in the future something may return.
But for now ICN is showing very good potential for store and forward and
propagation delay is just transport protocol.

Will

On 3/18/16, 11:48 AM, "dtn-interest on behalf of Eggert, Lars"
<dtn-interest-bounces@irtf.org on behalf of lars@netapp.com> wrote:

>Folks,
>
>since the creation of the DTN WG over in the IETF, the DTNRG has become
>rather quiet. I don't see a lot of new work being brought in. There also
>hasn't been a physical meeting in almost two years.
>
>I'm wondering if DTN has made the jump from research into engineering,
>and it's time to close the RG?
>
>Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email