[dtn-interest] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7116 (7000)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 21 June 2024 20:20 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@irtf.org
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C423C14F694; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id E61617FA79; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: ebirrane@gmail.com, kscott@mitre.org, marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240621202030.E61617FA79@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:20:30 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: XMMMTMRWO6HBIRS4JWZVKP5SVPN2LK2N
X-Message-ID-Hash: XMMMTMRWO6HBIRS4JWZVKP5SVPN2LK2N
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dtn-interest.irtf.org-0; header-match-dtn-interest.irtf.org-1; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: csp@csperkins.org, irsg@irtf.org, dtn-interest@irtf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [dtn-interest] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7116 (7000)
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group (DTNRG) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/snY7Rf_KKnm7m8tT3-50-39QA7Q>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn-interest>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dtn-interest-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dtn-interest-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dtn-interest-leave@irtf.org>
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC7116, "Licklider Transmission Protocol (LTP), Compressed Bundle Header Encoding (CBHE), and Bundle Protocol IANA Registries". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7000 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Technical Reported by: Ed Birrane <ebirrane@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2022-06-21 Held by: Colin Perkins (IRSG) Section: 3.2 Original Text ------------- Section 3.2: The CBHE specification [RFC6260] defines concepts of 'Node Number' and 'Service Number' that require registries managed by IANA. Section 3.2.1: IANA has set up a registry to manage CBHE Node Numbers. This registry, titled "CBHE Node Numbers", has been added to the list of registries associated with the Bundle Protocol. Section 3.2.2: IANA has set up a registry to manage CBHE Service Numbers. This registry, titled "CBHE Service Numbers", has been added to the list of registries associated with the Bundle Protocol. Corrected Text -------------- Section 3.2: The CBHE specification [RFC6260] defines concepts of 'Node Number' and 'Service Number' associated with the IPN naming scheme that require registries managed by IANA. Section 3.2.1: IANA has set up a registry to manage IPN Scheme Node Numbers. This registry, titled "IPN Node Numbers", has been added to the list of registries associated with the Bundle Protocol. Section 3.2.2: IANA has set up a registry to manage IPN Scheme Service Numbers. This registry, titled "IPN Service Numbers", has been added to the list of registries associated with the Bundle Protocol. Notes ----- The Compressed Bundle Header Encoding (CBHE) RFC6260 defines node numbers and service numbers for the IPN naming scheme. Therefore, the registries created by RFC7116 should have been titled "IPN Node Numbers" and "IPN Service Numbers" instead of "CBHE Node Numbers" and "CBHE Service Numbers". The IANA registries should be renamed, replacing CBHE with IPN to reflect this. This clarification is particularly important as BPv7 (RFC9171) can use the IPN naming scheme but does not have a concept of CBHE. [Update: addressed by draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update which will update this RFC when published] -------------------------------------- RFC7116 (draft-dtnrg-ltp-cbhe-registries-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Licklider Transmission Protocol (LTP), Compressed Bundle Header Encoding (CBHE), and Bundle Protocol IANA Registries Publication Date : February 2014 Author(s) : K. Scott, M. Blanchet Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group Stream : IRTF Verifying Party : IRSG
- [dtn-interest] [Errata Held for Document Update] … RFC Errata System