[dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing 'em...(author response required)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 15 November 2010 20:32 UTC
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.32.56]) by maillists.intel-research.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAFKWXQF021438 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:32:33 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18013E407B for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:32:40 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id h-6eWMV8kYxS for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:32:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.5] (dsl-102-234.cust.imagine.ie [87.232.102.234]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AD713E4077 for <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:32:39 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4CE198E5.8070809@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:32:37 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DTN <dtn-interest@mailman.dtnrg.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing 'em...(author response required)
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Delay Tolerant Networking Interest List <dtn-interest.maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/pipermail/dtn-interest>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@maillists.intel-research.net>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://maillists.intel-research.net/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@maillists.intel-research.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:32:34 -0000
Hi all, All (or almost all) those DTN related I-Ds are presumably intended to become RFCs. There's a big bunch so I want to put some manners on the set, in terms of when we plan to get done with each. I've sorted the on-line list into various states, some of which I've just invented but all of which should be obvious for anyone familiar with IETF or IRTF processes. The full list is below. Can document authors please reply to this mail with your plans for state changes for your documents? If I hear nothing, I'm gonna treat 'em as OBE or "probably dead." In each case, please clearly say which I-D, (just give the name), which state change (e.g. "7->6") you think is next, when you think that could happen (e.g. "in about two months") with realism being appreciated, and if the new state is not OBE or dead, (i.e. 8, 9 or 10), then please also give an assurance that you have the time available for moving the document forward. Negative information is also welcome, e.g. saying "would like draft-foo to go from 6->5, think that'd take a month or so but I don't have time, so suggest transitioning from 6->8" And since its a long list, if you spot a plain error, just reply with a suggested fix. I'd like all responses that imply future work for me in the near future by the end of next week please. That basically means anything about which I hear nothing before November 28 will be treated by me as being in one of states 8,9 or 10. Once I get all that, I'll try see if there's a sensible bunch to send to the IRSG at once, of if we just do 'em one at a time. Thanks, Stephen. DTNRG-related I-D status, 2010-11-15 stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Format is <last-rev-date,I-D-name> 1. RFC already 25-Jun-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-extensions 25-Jun-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp-motivation 25-Jun-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ltp 05-Jul-2007,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-spec 15-Dec-2006,draft-irtf-dtnrg-arch 2. RFC editor queue Nothing 3. IESG "end-run" review (Actually, I've not yet asked, gotta assemble the electronic paperwork in the next few days.) 11-Nov-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-cbhe 25-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-prophet 25-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-iana-bp-registries 11-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-sdnv 13-Sep-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-security 08-Jul-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-metadata-block 4. IRSG review Nothing 5. DTNRG "last-call-like-state" Nothing 6. work-in-progress, "accepted" by RG 14-Nov-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-checksum 11-Nov-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ecos 25-Oct-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-age-block 17-May-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-previous-hop-block 08-Mar-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ipnd 09-Feb-2010,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ding-network-management 05-Oct-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-retrans-block 12-Aug-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-divert 12-Aug-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-encapsulation 31-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-dtn-uri-scheme 09-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-sec-overview 09-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-eidrefs 09-Mar-2009,draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-metadata-conf 19-Nov-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-udp-clayer 03-Nov-2008,draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer 7. work-in-progress (individual) 14-Nov-2010,draft-wood-dtnrg-saratoga 14-Nov-2010,draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery 08-Nov-2010,draft-uehara-dtnrg-decentralized-probe-message 08-Nov-2010,draft-uehara-dtnrg-decentralized-probe-transport 08-Nov-2010,draft-farrell-dtnrg-bpq 20-Aug-2010,draft-burleigh-dtnrg-ltpcl 09-Jul-2010,draft-burleigh-dtnrg-cgr 28-Feb-2010,draft-fall-dtnrg-schl 27-Feb-2010,draft-mcmahon-dtnrg-dtn-edp 26-Oct-2009,draft-davies-dtnrg-uri-find 8. Overtaken by events (OBE) Nothing 9. Probably dead (maybe worth reviving?) 22-May-2009,draft-pbasu-dtnrg-naming 19-Jun-2007,draft-farrell-dtnrg-km 17-Apr-2007,draft-kutscher-dtnrg-uni-clayer 18-Nov-2007,draft-wyllie-dtnrg-badisc 13-Nov-2007,draft-ott-dtnrg-dtn-appl 26-May-2006,draft-eddy-dtnrg-eid 10. Almost certainly dead (just checking) 22-Mar-2010,draft-blanchet-dtnrg-iana-registries 24-Feb-2010,draft-ellard-dtnrg-reltime-htl 23-Nov-2009,draft-farrell-dtnrg-alt-time 12-Aug-2009,draft-symington-dtnrg-bundle-multicast-custodial 06-Jun-2009,draft-ivancic-dtnrg-network-management-reqs 08-Feb-2008,draft-symington-dtnrg-bundle-metadata-block 14-Aug-2007,draft-eddy-dtnrg-checksum 29-May-2007,draft-lindgren-dtnrg-prophet 18-Oct-2006,draft-demmer-dtnrg-tcp-clayer 13-Oct-2006,draft-symington-dtnrg-bundle-retrans-block 27-Oct-2003,draft-irtf-dtnrg-ipn-bundle-xfer
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Alex McMahon
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Alex McMahon
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Joerg Ott
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Simon Perreault
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Joerg Ott
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Joerg Ott
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Joerg Ott
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Keiichi SHIMA
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Clark, Gilbert
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Burleigh, Scott C (313B)
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Dan Brown
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Hans Kruse
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Daniel Ellard
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… L.Wood
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing '… Stephen Farrell
- [dtn-interest] Moving I-Ds along or killing 'em..… Stephen Farrell