[dtn-security] Re: Bundle Security Protocol details

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 17 November 2006 15:06 UTC

Received: from imx2.tcd.ie (imx2.tcd.ie []) by webbie.berkeley.intel-research.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id kAHF6gY17930 for <dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:06:42 -0800
Received: from Vams.imx2 (imx2.tcd.ie []) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with SMTP id 252EF68240; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:06:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imx2.tcd.ie ([]) by imx2.tcd.ie ([]) with SMTP (gateway) id A064462199C; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:06:36 +0000
Received: from [] (cswireless62-182.cs.tcd.ie []) by imx2.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F6268240; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:06:36 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <455DD032.50009@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:07:30 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Symington, Susan F." <susan@mitre.org>
Cc: Peter Lovell <peter.lovell@sparta.com>, hsw <hsw@sparta.com>, dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
References: <8E507634779E22488719233DB3DF9FF0012296CB@IMCSRV4.MITRE.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <8E507634779E22488719233DB3DF9FF0012296CB@IMCSRV4.MITRE.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus-Status: MessageID = A164462199C
X-AntiVirus-Status: Host: imx2.tcd.ie
X-AntiVirus-Status: Action Taken:
X-AntiVirus-Status: NONE
X-AntiVirus-Status: Checked by TCD Vexira. (version=1.56.3 VDF=8.1400)
Subject: [dtn-security] Re: Bundle Security Protocol details
Sender: dtn-security-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
Errors-To: dtn-security-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-BeenThere: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: DTN Security Discussion <dtn-security.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-security/>

Symington, Susan F. wrote:
> The key issue seems to be the assumption that the security result
> length will be known before it is calculated. Is this a bad assumption?

I think its a fine assumption, so long as "known," means "known to the
module that implements the ciphersuite."

But if someone has a counterexample I'd be interested in seeing that.