(dictionary or not) Re: [dtn-security] 00 version of the Bundle Security Protocol Spec.

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 25 May 2005 15:28 UTC

Received: from smtp3.tcd.ie (smtp3.tcd.ie []) by webbie.berkeley.intel-research.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j4PFSpV30542 for <dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>; Wed, 25 May 2005 08:28:51 -0700
Received: from Vams.smtp3 (smtp3.tcd.ie []) by smtp3.tcd.ie (Postfix) with SMTP id DED1814C035; Wed, 25 May 2005 16:28:44 +0100 (IST)
Received: from smtp3.tcd.ie ([]) by smtp3.tcd.ie ([]) with SMTP (gateway) id A01590D4E71; Wed, 25 May 2005 16:28:44 +0100
Received: from [] (mme145079.mme.tcd.ie []) by smtp3.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48CF14C035; Wed, 25 May 2005 16:28:44 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <42949AA1.5080108@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:32:49 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
Cc: "Susan F. Symington" <susan@mitre.org>, "'Howard Weiss'" <howard.weiss@sparta.com>
Subject: (dictionary or not) Re: [dtn-security] 00 version of the Bundle Security Protocol Spec.
References: <200505241854.j4OIsx724035@smtp-bedford-dr.mitre.org> <42944BEF.7090007@cs.tcd.ie> <20050525152359.GB7633@pisco.cs.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050525152359.GB7633@pisco.cs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus-Status: Checked by TCD Vexira. (version=1.55.010 VDF=8.730)
X-AntiVirus-Status: NONE
X-AntiVirus-Status: Action Taken:
X-AntiVirus-Status: Host: smtp3.tcd.ie
X-AntiVirus-Status: MessageID = A11590D4E71
Sender: dtn-security-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
Errors-To: dtn-security-admin@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-BeenThere: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: DTN Security Discussion <dtn-security.mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security>, <mailto:dtn-security-request@mailman.dtnrg.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.dtnrg.org/pipermail/dtn-security/>


I guess that that's possible, but I'd be for getting started
without the dictionary and changing to use it later if it
makes sense than.

But since you've suggested it: what's the easy way to encode
the optional src and/or optional dest optionally using the
dictionary? (I'm just not up to speed on how the dictionary
encoding currently works.)


Michael Demmer wrote:
> I must confess that I have as of yet only skimmed the document, but
> I'd like to put a vote in against not using the dictionary
> header. 
> While it may save a byte or two when encoding the length of the
> string, I'm betting that in the average case, the schemas of the PSH
> src/dest will overlap with something in the primary header so you're
> better off using the dictionary.
> -m
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-security mailing list
> dtn-security@mailman.dtnrg.org
> http://mailman.dtnrg.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-security