IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test

Johannes Morgenroth <morgenroth@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Wed, 19 March 2014 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <morgenroth@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
X-Original-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00A1A0751 for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id srI8oLZlUEBr for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de [134.169.34.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44901A03FE for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65A9181A5F for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:56:49 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ibr.cs.tu-bs.de; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent :from:from:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=key1; t= 1395237408; x=1397051809; bh=s9/+s/ed2tzOmkuuKOVmgY0wcCm3W8bMLUo 1asIWfKI=; b=rtpfblG3ygAI5KeHefmaLQ1PWiTOKNAj5pYcgk4KJvyyLASEx70 Wnqh/EiTCuz57X+Ge76hwx9111Wvn4FhtvF7MVbQ1idCi9oEKT4DOU+R/4EnCzZa 4fA6AP1PTtmX33CtByaQgVPhV8v8gYfGHN/p8tU6lkYG+MfG5d0z/Oew=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Received: from mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id BQbthC8XXEcb for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:56:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:638:602:1183:935:f20b:b26a:8993] (unknown [IPv6:2001:638:602:1183:935:f20b:b26a:8993]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: morgenro@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de) by mail.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54B81181353 for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:56:48 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5329A21E.8080809@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:56:46 +0100
From: Johannes Morgenroth <morgenroth@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dtn-users@irtf.org
References: <CF4F1230.10DC7%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <CF4F1230.10DC7%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-users/1CHtp9SOQA3L5pT7vT1AGZ_65fs
Subject: Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test
X-BeenThere: dtn-users@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Users." <dtn-users.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-users>, <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-users/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-users>, <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:57:00 -0000

Just to complete the specs...

Am 19.03.2014 14:32, schrieb Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0):
> ION supports LTP.  I do not believe IBR-DTN does.

Thats right.

> ION also supports IPN naming, Contract Graph Routing and CBHE (/Compressed Bundle Header
> Encoding).  If you are looking at space applications and deterministic
> routing, ION may be a better choice.  If you are looking a opportunistic
> routing, IBR-DTN may be better.  /

IBR-DTN also supports IPN naming and CBHE. However, I agree with you
that ION might be better suited for space applications.

Regards,
Johannes

-- 
Johannes Morgenroth     Institut fuer Betriebssysteme und Rechnerverbund
Tel.: +49-531-391-3249                           Muehlenpfordtstrasse 23
Fax.: +49-531-391-5936      TU Braunschweig         D-38106 Braunschweig

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email