Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test
"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Wed, 19 March 2014 13:33 UTC
Return-Path: <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2E11A0763 for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6,
MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfdrarfAAmUm for
<dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov
[IPv6:2001:4d0:a302:1100::103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
D80081A075E for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 06:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt103.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt103.ndc.nasa.gov
[198.117.1.197]) by ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id
695612D80C0; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:22:09 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from NDJSCHT116.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjscht116-pub.ndc.nasa.gov
[198.117.1.216]) by ndjsppt103.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
s2JDWvsk022604; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:32:57 -0500
Received: from NDJSMBX203.ndc.nasa.gov ([169.254.2.153]) by
NDJSCHT116.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.216]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001;
Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:32:57 -0500
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: =?Windows-1252?Q?Ma=EBl_Auzias?= <dtnrg@auzias.net>,
"dtn-users@irtf.org" <dtn-users@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test
Thread-Index: AQHPQ083BK4y6CfwH062AS7nRpTNl5roea2A
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:32:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CF4F1230.10DC7%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <CAOu+1s-rzmku8zEfnK-b2mPjXckT_72h-b_ApNAQCssdcARzYA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [184.56.61.175]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CF4F123010DC7williamdivancicnasagov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.87, 1.0.14,
0.0.0000 definitions=2014-03-19_05:2014-03-19, 2014-03-19,
1970-01-01 signatures=0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-users/GLZ2ip8-GoM4trUrGelCCOC5fgQ
Subject: Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test
X-BeenThere: dtn-users@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Users."
<dtn-users.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-users>,
<mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-users/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-users>,
<mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 13:33:09 -0000
I think that is really old. It is based on the Internet Draft –04, not even RFC5050. I suggest working with some newer code. Look at the wiki. http://www.dtnrg.org/wiki/Code But even the wiki has a lot of dated material. I will not endorse one implementation over another as I really haven't done much here lately. I will say that I have a number of small business doing research for NASA that have gravitated to IBR-DTN. You might want to try that one. ION also has been well maintained to date. ION supports LTP. I do not believe IBF-DTN does. ION also supports IPN naming, Contract Graph Routing and CBHE (Compressed Bundle Header Encoding). If you are looking at space applications and deterministic routing, ION may be a better choice. If you are looking a opportunistic routing, IBR-DTN may be better. Will From: Maël Auzias <dtnrg@auzias.net<mailto:dtnrg@auzias.net>> Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 4:42 AM To: "dtn-users@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>" <dtn-users@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>> Subject: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Hi everyone, I'm testing the BP-RI<http://masaka.cs.ohiou.edu/ocp/bundling.html> implementation. Once I got it compiled without any error I try to run it as described in the README. However an error occurs at the start, here is the output: root@pc-mna-78:~/BP-RI/classes# java edu.ohiou.ocp.dtn.BPServer#more configuration details below Off-World Communication Protocols Research Group BP-RI: 1.0 Starting BP Server:v1.0... BPServer failed to bind to //localhost/BPServer! - Connection refused to host: localhost; nested exception is: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused Did someone already get through this one ? Also I cannot find anything related with dynamic neighbors discovery (neither in the source code, neither in the doc, neither in the conf-file), is there any mechanism which take care of it ? Configuration details root@pc-mna-78:~/BP-RI/classes# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 wlan0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 wlan0 root@pc-mna-78:~/BP-RI/classes# ifconfig lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:4808 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4808 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:1011705 (987.9 KiB) TX bytes:1011705 (987.9 KiB) wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0c:60:76:66:2d:64 inet addr:192.168.0.78 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::e60:76ff:fe66:2d64/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:11742 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:6484792 TX packets:17905 errors:31 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:682229 (666.2 KiB) TX bytes:10328677 (9.8 MiB) Interrupt:17
- [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Maël Auzias
- Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Maël Auzias
- Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Johannes Morgenroth
- Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Jayram Déshpandé
- Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Jayram Déshpandé
- Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Burleigh, Scott C (312G)
- Re: [dtn-users] BP-RI implementation test Jim Miner (jminer)