[dtn-users] DTN2 Routing problem : STACK TRACE

Mohammad Rifqi <rifqi15dn@gmail.com> Mon, 30 November 2015 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <rifqi15dn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E710C1ACE23 for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:33:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M57m-G4ktMBu for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 539221ACE1E for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lfaz4 with SMTP id z4so199105895lfa.0 for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:33:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=g9rfmxaJaAALucMjwqgV250FZeTpOJoqVRjyIkqnt1w=; b=aEBViVzJCSdMxBhZvw80y+4Nev4gALHAYy/l8zrkvIY5CN9mTdjV4OcldJkaJskYZZ 3iUXh9i2TiNsdTO+76EYYNW6s5K/niQxGALb9sJI4PZTH0ZflcA1buqGpT3khIOGIvQL FfQ5i1j3G+U3meJKcsLkuE6gw/0ZLoWOpQK8o3mzGE52DNZFTCF23Pow/y4gBaT/ZotH dSF7DVEkjdnMf11OB+Mf+v8stBKcLNcUwLkEyA2gWlgAVnuPUGmyMKZn20lmGvWC2cL/ sex6QqvoGQOiwmXZhLUzbv0AQZXFeUMulZQr0l4gEMaUBafFUAlv0Z6imUbxz8NgtgQg 1miA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.151.67 with SMTP id uo3mr4934179lbb.43.1448893990410; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.144.201 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:33:10 +0700
Message-ID: <CALyC+gcDWaFg_53FygUZBiJAkD1aEYSc+UF4cS_jFJUgcBU4uA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mohammad Rifqi <rifqi15dn@gmail.com>
To: dtn-users@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a821e9d9fa20525c2ebe7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-users/OV41zr7502Kuf_qtugAUQ3spVhE>
Subject: [dtn-users] DTN2 Routing problem : STACK TRACE
X-BeenThere: dtn-users@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Users." <dtn-users.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-users>, <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn-users/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-users>, <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:33:14 -0000

Dear all,

I want to run 5 DTN node in 2 hop topology scenario with DTLSR routing,
source and destination node connected with dtn node 1,2,and 3 but couldn't
reach each other.
When I try to send ping packet use dtnping, sometimes it show error like
this in node 1, node 2, and node 3:

warning: Bundle::del_ref is waiting for spin lock held by (null), which has
reached spin limit
STACK TRACE: 0x76f51c84 0x3eda8 0x3ed00 0x59444 0x43298 0x41ea8 0xcaf6c
0xca3a4 0x156778 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c
0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c 0x76f52f0c


the impact is, the link to node 1, node 2 or node 3 become unavailable, in
your opinion, what should I do?

Thanks,
Rifqi