Re: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN
"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Wed, 15 January 2014 17:53 UTC
Return-Path: <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 438261AE378 for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:53:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Og_vUFy0piic for
<dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov
[IPv6:2001:4d0:8302:1100::102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
252E81AE24B for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ndjsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov
[198.117.1.198]) by ndmsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20783D000E;
Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:52:52 -0600 (CST)
Received: from NDJSCHT109.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjscht109-pub.ndc.nasa.gov
[198.117.1.209]) by ndjsppt104.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
s0FHqmwp022015; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:52:49 -0600
Received: from NDJSMBX203.ndc.nasa.gov ([169.254.2.158]) by
NDJSCHT109.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.209]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:52:49 -0600
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: James Jones <james@telixnet.com>, "dtn-users@irtf.org" <dtn-users@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN
Thread-Index: AQHPEhEjNhZE487naEixITCn0YKuwJqGIeMA
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:52:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CEFC309D.CC31%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <CEFC2457.3021E%james@telixnet.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [184.56.61.175]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CEFC309DCC31williamdivancicnasagov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.87, 1.0.14,
0.0.0000 definitions=2014-01-15_06:2014-01-15, 2014-01-15,
1970-01-01 signatures=0
Subject: Re: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN
X-BeenThere: dtn-users@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Users."
<dtn-users.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-users>,
<mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-users/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-users>,
<mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:53:04 -0000
FEC and DTN has many connotations. Perhaps you might specify where you want the FEC. Basically FEC on the point-to-point link between DTN forwarding agents is a transport thing. FEC or rather erasure codes somewhere in the Application/DTN chain is a bit of a different animal. Look at some of the BBN proposals. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-dtnrg-zinky-erasure-coding-extension-00 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-dtnrg-zinky-erasure-coding-objects-00 Here is a presentation: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/slides/DTNRG-2.pdf Most DTNs you will probably find information on have been run over IP simply because it is the easiest to start and DTN is a network overlay. NASA JPL has run DTN over, I believe, CCSDS space links. The DARPA program BBN Spindle implementation ran IP over DTN with, I believe, DTN mapped to the radio MAC. (Others, feel free to add or correct these statements.) Cheers, Will From: James Jones <james@telixnet.com<mailto:james@telixnet.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:45 AM To: "dtn-users@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>" <dtn-users@irtf.org<mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>> Subject: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN Greetings, I am still quite new to this list and DTN. I had a few really quick questions: 1. What is currently being used for FEC (Forward Error Correction), if any? 2. If there is already work being done is there anyway to do testing against vs a different FEC method? 3. Is most DTNs IP based? -James
- [dtn-users] FEC in DTN James Jones
- Re: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)
- Re: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN Daniel Ellard
- Re: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN l.wood