IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN

<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Wed, 15 January 2014 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699971AE245 for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:58:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pOPOMkecpIxU for <dtn-users@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.151]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DF51AE102 for <dtn-users@irtf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [195.245.231.67:57568] by server-15.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 05/94-08490-58407D25; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:58:29 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-82.messagelabs.com!1389823109!34022420!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.43]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 5997 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2014 21:58:29 -0000
Received: from exht022p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT022P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.43) by server-3.tower-82.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Jan 2014 21:58:29 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.204]) by EXHT022P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.43]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:58:28 +0000
From: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
To: <james@telixnet.com>, <dtn-users@irtf.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:57:31 +0000
Thread-Topic: FEC in DTN
Thread-Index: AQHPEhEjNhZE487naEixITCn0YKuwJqGVXHA
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346CD@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <CEFC2457.3021E%james@telixnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEFC2457.3021E%james@telixnet.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN
X-BeenThere: dtn-users@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Users." <dtn-users.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-users>, <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-users/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-users@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-users>, <mailto:dtn-users-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:58:44 -0000

Actually, I think it's fair to say that most DTNs are *TCP*/IP based - and most use of the bundle
protocol has been over TCP.

Lloyd Wood
http://about.me/lloydwood
________________________________________
From: dtn-users [dtn-users-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of James Jones [james@telixnet.com]
Sent: 15 January 2014 16:45
To: dtn-users@irtf.org
Subject: [dtn-users] FEC in DTN

Greetings,

I am still quite new to this list and DTN. I had a few really quick questions:


 1.  What is currently being used for FEC (Forward Error Correction), if any?
 2.  If there is already work being done is there anyway to do testing against vs a different FEC method?
 3.  Is most DTNs IP based?

-James

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email