Re: [dtn] on obsoleting RFC5050

"Marc Blanchet" <> Sat, 19 October 2019 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096FA1200EB for <>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.011
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3SrhfbXVi2w2 for <>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9BA1200E6 for <>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id e66so8592035qkf.13 for <>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=55U7Ws/QdzwiSllyQTvtG0GN4BlXX1MfxAszIW9b6XI=; b=kLEbY9T158vwXKBOGQp+75238d5AG4/pA2PGWM5u3pM1fOqEDAzGe0HRrBQJw7swZR jG1a+cqT8GIu0zZdIh2w/h8HLaINs4bg5qr7YOKqxyl7kvWOY014fltHEGg+hx4n0LZy 0My0CLPs4sfYuyJALq2JmhxDScaJcpmE6BiC6FW4KfTo0ysa0gg4Du4HNiMfAMTrQsTc ZQ5MROAxm2xBspFBjLps5/qmdKdj689C24U8RgUjLjmKSvbCiXh2CHuHSXywBCaByNBx sn3WyP+xzA6frLvK6dE3qA0ZwysTu/Deu1Tgpiry4bQPmASTX3cceN4VS5j6YvAS1FEU Ag4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=55U7Ws/QdzwiSllyQTvtG0GN4BlXX1MfxAszIW9b6XI=; b=c1iAeDfxKpagN+y/RMdWRdRnfoCOH0eRXrBDaZyZA1tmgQkQ+7A9hLuHIMkXOazmvj yhgmxAT6Si+HA+bN9X0Rv8EbqNxOtwBdRXva/Es9zTHXReUgjtDCoSJziJ4KcjDur629 /zxju74q5Wm0iKkfVJ3TMrMvaMuu/rz9UcNqU2mohpXZTsbRLusyQYGHLKJj8QRtGUc5 gwMZYlq209TpOMS+wgdINbHT8E9veu+uWSPcR9vGP976ZPalrZLrnc2IQGGQ4PmFRT1Q vSbt49nEKdeFKv75sGh+uyOFD0LZuZUkfazxvM6LkSdm6hbp/OXec/yNcNBuoiUcfkdJ HL8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtOIDUxluSDOD+SspGJTzwZLG+hcI6i73cjsgTNYwqgfKqkYuv p26yHor+A0vYUD6kIXvi7CEaI/gWerPQIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxXDHl1SgwqBczSMET1HXJwElkOLubFxznld4xFCObaCJXtpSfg77GgLLBBcbZ0cmRTTLhucA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:8e46:: with SMTP id q67mr15717979qkd.455.1571518024977; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id c185sm5559405qkf.122.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Oct 2019 13:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Marc Blanchet" <>
To: "Burleigh, Scott C" <>
Cc: "DTN WG" <>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:47:02 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13r5655)
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dtn] on obsoleting RFC5050
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:47:08 -0000

On 18 Oct 2019, at 17:20, Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B) wrote:

> Hello.  Jumping the gun a little bit, I have posted an updated 
> Internet Draft (version 15) for BPbis.  I believe this draft reflects 
> all of the agreements we have reached since the start of the Area 
> Director’s review, and it anticipates consensus on the question of 
> obsoleting RFC 5050 as discussed below.

up to now, everybody who spoke up on the chairs’ proposal agreed, so 
it looks good. Let’s wait a little bit more before declaring 

However, I think we are not yet done for the IANA considerations 
section. I started creating a email with proposed changes for the IANA 
sections and registries, but it became very convoluted. So I reverted to 
a google doc, so people can better see my comments, rationale, etc…  I 
have not yet finished comments on all registries, but would like to 
share right away my thinking.