Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete?
Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Thu, 26 September 2019 11:02 UTC
Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04BB1208AA for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmeOrJQYxsnF for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr80048.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.8.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E681208A7 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=D28+wYGWeHFfXLdONJ9iPZgekbDf1kUd4cEIe3iMv75sxejRRGb0TmwWDRcUWazEDuRNC5cs9JJQZO9JpuEZeDS0iSAOwt6wGv6iRLPF54ltKB1x8LChLP2UcFBNgOaM1hAtY7VhaD7AZ7KkxjI+ahrA7WmjKTj2xitl6L8QytLk+lC6v2kTzDlndxX9B5Mj3Fat08YBSOiLnh4rQi/Y5+SOT+J7Mg67LX74rSKXNooR/qWOlJapElvohMPgu/DzXI2LVCVAHIfFV58k5WLby6/yvsdgY9/BC4FSlYHdxmy5yFhZDYvLkVZ95jxoY6JFVXeoDEwXBcaohtw6jQXg0Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9/Lu5BTaBq5YT6dxy+k2B38xsLN4RBVg9Ewz8UXQ74E=; b=YhfyB+nOn1wZOJ+KAsp7EiJMjNLRt8lMZI3LNsPVrAyGhkLVATV8H4yM+nOGBa0lISNqW8iTpIIqkSpR7o26GOgGeWWlsr8vv9QGzkax7q+g71rmuoF+M9Ehzb2WMdDboyaxXEoFipS+Ie1Z540l4QL7oNCcDX4sVDNb1rkiBLU4ZztWFF6DgunJHylxMJZmHiGWbGxFNAA4FbLDI+Us6eQLh42Rm3ptiFmV6t1oJXg61Q8EzgwewpBpRp4b8MN4yYHaaiHtGrwgLJY2HyKo6HlgEkA65aIynPlz7j7+8ZuKQW79uV2xmy9ef5Q4b5xPea90qnxIrsEWzATqXzghTg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9/Lu5BTaBq5YT6dxy+k2B38xsLN4RBVg9Ewz8UXQ74E=; b=S7iL9HjeQkR28hjZRt7iQglykneSpZLUjXbLmC+GcmrweVmERWwa4fqQcQh3DUuGIw+DqViUWtr0y6ymE6gzfsMS11/giCMvma94A7l83SAfuWhoNyuZSfVUy2VpNTS9NL35lK7o0gT7mzQ1V/VX2WE/5AmSfdRHUTZV8Kn9pwY=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.177.194.155) by DB7PR07MB5946.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.45.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.11; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:02:06 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e48c:a942:9682:2ce4]) by DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e48c:a942:9682:2ce4%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.017; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:02:06 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: "cabo@tzi.org" <cabo@tzi.org>, "csp@csperkins.org" <csp@csperkins.org>
CC: "rja.lists@gmail.com" <rja.lists@gmail.com>, "irtf-chair@irtf.org" <irtf-chair@irtf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete?
Thread-Index: AQHVb8zJ4yFYQLaGbkWRYSuGB6CGYqc47rqAgAAlEgCAABM/gIABjPYAgAAEOYCAACohAIAC8bQA
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:02:05 +0000
Message-ID: <e31715985fc1b4b5ac9338a24e7abf66ace00cf7.camel@ericsson.com>
References: <ecc5ee275929440b8b70d570451219a77dc5a176.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com> <1376435003.14731004.1569226573419@mail.yahoo.com> <7DC9F8DB-00E1-47C6-8F05-93771AEE4B0C@tzi.org> <75A02579-9C5A-4692-86FA-B5B73AF84A2A@csperkins.org> <780D35E5-B4CA-4C77-A217-19034BB60EE8@gmail.com> <66CC5320-E483-4FC9-A610-1D79A899A704@tzi.org> <10753318-5C0A-4401-A028-EAB657CF9002@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <10753318-5C0A-4401-A028-EAB657CF9002@csperkins.org>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [192.176.1.83]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a90f22d9-1d28-4354-91de-08d74270f7fb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB5946:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB5946C7324EE18C04722AAEFC95860@DB7PR07MB5946.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0172F0EF77
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(14454004)(5660300002)(6486002)(86362001)(25786009)(6436002)(64756008)(66446008)(66476007)(305945005)(76116006)(91956017)(118296001)(99936001)(66616009)(478600001)(229853002)(44832011)(486006)(8936002)(446003)(11346002)(81166006)(66556008)(476003)(2616005)(2906002)(8676002)(99286004)(81156014)(36756003)(6116002)(6506007)(186003)(3846002)(26005)(102836004)(2501003)(54906003)(7736002)(110136005)(256004)(71200400001)(66946007)(76176011)(14444005)(6246003)(4326008)(66066001)(71190400001)(316002)(6512007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB5946; H:DB7PR07MB5736.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: uA0kl4h+55zoUgouW+9PPO6t5iDjRVaIRlqHnP1iqpctOYqDkul7zZ0ijnwnXEpyuBAJCA/6HnVmuyOLUxmNdV4uUMToKZuhN4SqcAWsfiZNOdO4/JJPoBfa1K3SMqMNIs/MADqvEeAbCTjnx7gBx7j/SgWIgeXXgXst049xBC9zPYXnFUeuH5RdfXZRacZKWAUTB7lB8ygK7l7xWH6v2M1O27YsxsY50ISxGxqmKk+fZ+Y7Vhk/82SIeqIuIuvB3X5pbb2JrlaVtTTVUwqktrrGXhPAQG7KayP2UnrNNd5rRh6CXmO+gg9xRETjVNeNgsXLGBhTlpFWx/WkSwU+BWftjLpI6LrTcQNTTy6NoATvJMK87tXKPlP2ec5kDMTjGoybNJS7erstGdRLBsOOHAIVxsr8i0cbHBm69GsjLnQ=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-256"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-bDRA+0TxacGGfplJYQdu"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a90f22d9-1d28-4354-91de-08d74270f7fb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Sep 2019 11:02:05.9084 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WdpwD6MpKB+1Gfatb0O8lWMiiAdNPv67xGRhwGBmkiysZjO6UXw1ANpkgJLE50+CHb/W2hgGobGSPJuvmWXwF4oXn37CcPGGkGVew2+bdkw=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB5946
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/2EAYp7uc60WpnhHBD6rfyufOGEA>
Subject: Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete?
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:02:13 -0000
On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 15:04 +0100, Colin Perkins wrote: > > > > > — put out the formal request to the IRTF chair at the time the document is > > submitted to the IESG (i.e., “leaves the WG”) — as always, an early heads up > > is probably appreciated, but the IRTF chair’s decision should be based on > > what actually leaves the WG. > > An early heads-up from working group would be appreciated, and might be useful > to avoid late surprises, but I'd expect the formal request to change the > status of the IRTF RFC to come from the IESG, not the working group. > Yes, and I think a formal request to the IRTF chair and IRSG is easy to create as the document goes for IETF last call. That way the IESG should have that agreement in hand prior to deciding on approving the document. Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Network Architecture & Protocols, Ericsson Research ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Torshamnsgatan 23 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Rick Taylor
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Stan Ratliff
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Rick Taylor
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Carlo Caini
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Rick Taylor
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Colin Perkins
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? R. Atkinson
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Colin Perkins
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Loiseau lucien
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Carsten Bormann
- Re: [dtn] Marking RFC5050 as Obsolete? Templin (US), Fred L