IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dtn] BPbis - mandatory BPsec

"Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Wed, 29 July 2020 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578603A0DAB for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_GOV_DKIM_AU=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jpl.nasa.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X_Fo7THIH9HJ for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384E73A0D94 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 06T0evPr183680 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:55 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=InSight1906; bh=GZhBYgeocv20jBzVkgyvuxq/VJ0Wt7CKgEElKoPN1QM=; b=5igzbjLlt3Pcs3OX24eB8Oa+urjW+fUJxGjDWek2RYaVlrrKDW9AREMOvmX1PY8oPYsT syRQj6AaD5FLqQimbfp99GxTK+sZ/ej+fzZ8Sv8XEhpWs4IJ5NUlTWHk50z4AODqRs0A zigOlZojsm8ORgLOAWEfpi5QsZJbGNaN3G1gEiL5G+4rC4m9TmunC2sJp0/kBul5ahaN rfXtp3/HN0DnYddsyZeDv5+WU899r+I/E3rZQ02ZbUK8+4hHO9VMMd7CtFDH0qYAzccU NBmPr1dIrsHxjhVP+Gd4+d3Y4p0txSAK/d0PdWl4QyYtJqYV80VyL7+hkyVmmAlUzETN cw==
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altphysenclup03.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.120]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov with ESMTP id 32ghu82ghd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:55 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp60.RES.AD.JPL (ap-embx16-sp60.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.141]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id 06T0ntxE003366 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:55 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp60.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:898d::8095:898d) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:54 -0700
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.1979.003; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:49:54 -0700
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BPbis - mandatory BPsec
Thread-Index: AdZlQfyYScJX39unS4SzUmv6/KTwUw==
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:49:54 +0000
Message-ID: <4da9776f577e4f09b5e8d248437e5f3a@jpl.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.151.104.72]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4da9776f577e4f09b5e8d248437e5f3ajplnasagov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: ap-embx16-sp60.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.141]
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-28_17:2020-07-28, 2020-07-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=899 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2006250000 definitions=main-2007290002
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/5PXW97Ir1uPD9S7lOtypCrJPXbA>
Subject: [dtn] BPbis - mandatory BPsec
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:49:57 -0000

Hi.  At IETF-108 there was discussion on whether implementation of the BPsec security extensions should be mandatory in every BP node.  Version 26 of the BPbis I-D (now posted) includes some revision to the first paragraph of section 9.0 to address this question.  It would be helpful to discover the WG consensus on this matter.

Please use this thread for your comments.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email