Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 03 November 2020 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3DF3A1323; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:49:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrGfAwhms7K2; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 322EA3A1321; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0A31n81E004016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:49:12 -0500
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:49:07 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Cc: "superuser@gmail.com" <superuser@gmail.com>, "scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, "barryleiba@computer.org" <barryleiba@computer.org>, "scott.c.burleigh=40jpl.nasa.gov@dmarc.ietf.org" <scott.c.burleigh=40jpl.nasa.gov@dmarc.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>, "dtn-chairs@ietf.org" <dtn-chairs@ietf.org>, "fred.l.templin@boeing.com" <fred.l.templin@boeing.com>
Message-ID: <20201103014907.GE39170@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <160350262630.29720.15789036776464124673@ietfa.amsl.com> <a128b55cf94744e39b4f7f4f24f3b87b@jpl.nasa.gov> <aad0e4fb63cf3802c89ff82cacf70aafe17b8b52.camel@ericsson.com> <1cc3330148e2429dba8d17ff9f62e14b@jpl.nasa.gov> <e09ad19c4038a2161db5fb7c922f4fa785345af4.camel@ericsson.com> <38fa8a01897242abaea34ece20e125ee@jpl.nasa.gov> <20201030210717.GJ39170@kduck.mit.edu> <04fa74f06fedbdf22a602b839850981e8093d6d5.camel@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <04fa74f06fedbdf22a602b839850981e8093d6d5.camel@ericsson.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/8xkk1crcI49y2lVzpvmST_7hGnM>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 06:45:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 01:49:27 -0000

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:33:12AM +0000, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> My current proposal is to simply note that this specification of the DTN URI has
> a restricted syntax compared to RFC 5050 that was not as clear on what syntax
> was allowed. And this is simply based on that there now exists an ABNF that
> describes the syntax. 
> 
> I was mistaken about the general URI syntax, and thus have no issue with
> continuing as currently specified. 

Ah, thanks for clarifying.  That proposal makes sense to me.

-Ben