Re: [dtn] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"R. Atkinson" <rja.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31FD3A0DD8 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Wmhy38spxE5 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0EED3A0B75 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id r7so1392848qkf.3 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZIf3TMErO/RaiqMRWcjetzQrXGuq8GxEe0PXLcmiyOs=; b=rP4tu/fJLSwJbn6tOCF36rOZNc1xfb51jMkqb6avreSAWW2tiTV2aB/y8yhe0tymnO z/krXnCaTqkyCEv7KCYD8oscswQIfKrEBsH3rra8Tjc+sdLHuSE1nvLgbZci2rq7xs/O T/BL/2QOdpncswtXHFFX8k+aOESHkKEQPTiUIlX3pdhHlh8op31cWfWpSgiSNAZZmcYJ LYZBlw7V13oOxo0GcwrKoqfpIGpcB+oX2+mF32l6KcI+WWZW+Kus3phz9C/EREA82yFc dlY1q5X4HI0FXdSGM3dNUyMLQoLTPlIrhThN06x6O3nYCL1PRF7XzD6eZ6AfMQJasRkV lPXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZIf3TMErO/RaiqMRWcjetzQrXGuq8GxEe0PXLcmiyOs=; b=nGKXayCM9KOihLGjP1mlH+MULlAgzj0EA8uvj6nQe7FUCBBuHxTCcwCYIzDFoQIjOP mWXxbVu5nICI+7tSP+F7QJ4c30MrQNX8o0UIf9uS15TIQkyYzb3QlssQY3IVgejBq8Bw yGXmcSlHzR1MPsj2tK2YQ968t3mfj98ZK66Bw2LJyCEGDtlM1jTD0uP60FNxKZxnZVIl WKJxp8v6qrA5Y0xuWuQsfqnOrh3oMWEUlc8iPiiUl4gtS9IWCpBVRL34oFJxmQ96PRpy uoqBwz16g+Te8Pkfs7k181zhnAtlS13I9por0eV0cpXAPH3w2L//R38bX/Gd9YNqmbrF HI4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531azoRuKuoWhlQLF7Jthqx3CvLraXPV2Msi/FxBxfUf68KDhsk1 QQdd9hrdsqQUtgW/J9vhZlEMtR50baw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweRTcKUJ0P/BxX/TtLqsqpUAhYdXnqL3pssCViWeinJrVP9hEqqKkvhNknhariJG5NzPmWGA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:c07:: with SMTP id l7mr2599990qki.9.1603810354569; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.20.28] (pool-141-156-180-77.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [141.156.180.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm801136qkv.110.2020.10.27.07.52.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: "R. Atkinson" <rja.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB3567B7727DF06411E47A826A9F160@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:52:33 -0400
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <783E2375-CDBE-4BCC-B550-5B0A40D3FF51@gmail.com>
References: <158215235500.17580.7759757155303566523.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50c5dae1bc26ade7d0fcd9388873665868f7284c.camel@rkf-eng.com> <20201001015416.GE89563@kduck.mit.edu> <MN2PR13MB3567B7727DF06411E47A826A9F160@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
To: DTN WG <dtn@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/BeE8wLiSxdadSAn4PfF0rYtfF34>
Subject: Re: [dtn] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:52:45 -0000


> On Oct 26, 2020, at 23:49, Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com> wrote:
> 
> For my own purposes and for public network use TLS would be expected, so I don't have a full idea of when TLS would be desirable to negotiate away.

A trivial example — which I stress is purely hypothetical:

	DTN could be used to communicate between a military ground station
	and some military satellite in some orbit.  In this case, very probably there
	would be a military-grade link encryptor installed on both ends and ALL
	communications over the RF link would have military-grade encryption.

	In that case, TLS probably could not improve security and it ought to
	prevent link-layer data compression from working as intended (since 
	any encrypted data blob ought not be compressible from first principles 
	of Information Theory).

Yours,

Ran