IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] Various IESG "DISCUSS" positions on draft-ietf-dtn-*

"Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Mon, 10 February 2020 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5984012080E; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jpl.nasa.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id umJdyiJozypN; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81D3812081A; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 01AG59ir024753; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:35 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=InSight1906; bh=SgwqL17BRY0vMqgJQUCXJOMzWZMoBV8itdBxgwe0O2I=; b=KVCQlhaKROW+xRTxC8ssLlZmBpJleTNJo6xCfJ99iCjTZ+kGN3l7+rt+n0pCwJrgbWXL 7O531i1wn0kIFa/Fr8Bhdxx1xbKAYqOQF+/hSWFz7+AhGEW87/TWEz8wpGeCzRCG0eVU 1YZzvySejFJ41Tk5F0447h+4hWu3hOsDulyrzxC8Ph9/IANWOb8/qBCqcAnAiGlVLBnj zP7HiXdop+2it32MUSDpRGQ9dkosge+MpeovZStB9IJuK5UxFqMHXQOcMDdeIEwj4EX7 /+BkGqaMcw63qLiaMqOzOWgwVRHNPWs39bWxFpW8sfwuyD4fcUjxr2YiUO98W3k4S6+Y MQ==
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altphysenclup02.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.53]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov with ESMTP id 2y1tyc5n6j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:35 -0800
Received: from ap-embx16-sp20.RES.AD.JPL (ap-embx16-sp20.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.84]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id 01AGFYsU029354 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified FAIL); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:35 -0800
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp20.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8954::8095:8954) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:34 -0800
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.1591.008; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:15:34 -0800
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: "Taylor, Rick" <rick.taylor@airbus.com>, "R. Atkinson" <rja.lists@gmail.com>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
CC: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn] Various IESG "DISCUSS" positions on draft-ietf-dtn-*
Thread-Index: AQHV4C0uhh3mFO716EeDiSFcfUkTkKgUmjTg
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:15:34 +0000
Message-ID: <dadd776834a84a568ba368b5f4467462@jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <302D5B48-16CB-410D-9E0A-2D4EA38C36D7@gmail.com> <8d8d9a6d24f64c7a8a5c6691d09c17fb@CD1-4BDAG04-P04.cdmail.common.airbusds.corp>
In-Reply-To: <8d8d9a6d24f64c7a8a5c6691d09c17fb@CD1-4BDAG04-P04.cdmail.common.airbusds.corp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.151.104.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: ap-embx16-sp20.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.84]
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-10_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2002100122
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/HJcHpD1n967If_l_WVpFLNBc5SI>
Subject: Re: [dtn] Various IESG "DISCUSS" positions on draft-ietf-dtn-*
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:15:51 -0000

Sure, I can certainly do that.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: dtn <dtn-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Taylor, Rick
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 2:29 AM
To: R. Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>; dtn@ietf.org
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dtn] Various IESG "DISCUSS" positions on draft-ietf-dtn-*


Hi Ran,

You make a very valid point.  Can I reach out to the authors in advance of Vancouver, to request that they perhaps present a short piece on what last minute changes have gone in.

Of course, any summaries to the list would be great as well, but I understand it is still a little bit of a moving target.

Cheers,

Rick Taylor

-----Original Message-----
From: dtn [mailto:dtn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of R. Atkinson
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 7:05 PM
To: dtn@ietf.org
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [dtn] Various IESG "DISCUSS" positions on draft-ietf-dtn-*


All,

It is great to see such rapid email list responses answering various questions and seeking to address concerns on various topics — from various IESG members.

I am concerned that we all keep in mind that implementers will be working from the final RFCs — and in many cases will NOT be reading these email responses.

If something is unclear or unexplained in an I-D and an explanation was needed to resolve one of the IESG member’s concerns, then IMHO that should result in the I-D editors/authors editing the relevant I-Ds to embed those clarifications inside the final RFC which WILL be referenced by implementers.

Purely as an example, if there is existing practice of using static routes or using some external specification, the practice ought to be documented and any applicable external specification ought to be both mentioned in the I-D (at least briefly) and also cited.  That way the reader won’t be left wondering how BP possibly could be deployed to the ISS or elsewhere.

Just 2 cents from the peanut gallery. :-)

Cheers,

Ran

_______________________________________________
dtn mailing list
dtn@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn
This email and its attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If you have received them in error you must not use, copy or disclose their content to any person.  Please notify the sender immediately and then delete this email from your system.  This e-mail has been scanned for viruses, but it is the responsibility of the recipient to conduct their own security measures. Airbus Operations Limited is not liable for any loss or damage arising from the receipt or use of this e-mail.

Airbus Operations Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, registration number, 3468788.  Registered office:  Pegasus House, Aerospace Avenue, Filton, Bristol, BS34 7PA, UK.
_______________________________________________
dtn mailing list
dtn@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email