Re: [dtn] draft-blanchet-dtn-email-over-bp-00.txt

"Stuart W. Card" <stu.card@critical.com> Fri, 20 January 2023 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <stu.card@critical.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2231C14CF09 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:51:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YbvyFzZ08-m1 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.critical.com (mail.critical.com [209.217.211.166]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64E8C14CF01 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:51:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.critical.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id C07743801C; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:39:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.129.146] (ip-72-10-210-250.nwptny.ntcnet.net [72.10.210.250]) by mail.critical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81DC1855D; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:39:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <cc776980-4262-b270-ccce-6b9c92e54920@critical.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:51:39 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Cc: DTN WG <dtn@ietf.org>
References: <9cecd3fb-a4e9-4a73-0670-ac564e0330e3@cs.tcd.ie> <7FC6B70D-6A81-45AE-9462-F9CCE201D70E@gmail.com> <C7DADA37-99E9-424E-A1BF-2E388A13503A@viagenie.ca> <9dbca394-dabc-da7c-3f28-68d96224a074@critical.com> <60A8D640-6DA5-43ED-B2E5-17F3417D3517@viagenie.ca>
From: "Stuart W. Card" <stu.card@critical.com>
Organization: Critical Technologies Inc.
In-Reply-To: <60A8D640-6DA5-43ED-B2E5-17F3417D3517@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/LKaNRDEBEbCRDhXiTbPCGgXtphc>
Subject: Re: [dtn] draft-blanchet-dtn-email-over-bp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:51:46 -0000

We made no explicit attempt to comply with RFC2442.
Our focus was making the bundle small & sending it on a one-way link.
We used open source BSMTP code we found on-line, where I forget.
I just asked our email software developer where he got it.

On 1/20/2023 12:31 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> 
>> Le 20 janv. 2023 à 12:14, Stuart W. Card <stu.card@critical.com> a écrit :
>>
>> Marc et al --
>> 
>> ... we developed a mostly transparent gateway that provided DTN services to legacy applications...
> 
> Thanks for the papers. Will read thoroughly.  Have a question, for BSMTP, you were encapsulating RFC2442? Which implementation have you used for BSMTP?

-- 
Stuart W. Card, PhD: VP & Chief Scientist, Critical Technologies Inc.
* Creativity * Diversity * Expertise * Flexibility * Integrity *
Suite 400 Technology Center, 4th Floor 1001 Broad St, Utica NY 13501
315-793-0248 x141 FAX -9710 <Stu.Card@critical.com> www.critical.com