[dtn] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-29: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 24 November 2020 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFAC3A005D; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:10:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis@ietf.org, dtn-chairs@ietf.org, dtn@ietf.org, Fred Templin <fred.l.templin@boeing.com>, fred.l.templin@boeing.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.23.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <160625941309.8306.2346706788736776737@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:10:13 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/MX4yOTwB3vYWfWxEjw7FDdR5xQc>
Subject: [dtn] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-29: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:10:13 -0000

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-29: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sec 4.1.5.1.2 I though this section was all about endpoint IDs. So what are the
"all other purposes" that involve ASCII representations?

Sec 7. Please add "congestion control" to the list of services the CL provides.

Sec 10. There are many instances in these registries of a codepoint only
applying to Version 6, but including 'RFC-to-be' as a reference. Is this a
mistake, or am I missing something?