IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-15

"Mehmet Ersue" <mersue@gmail.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC78120251; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:04:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4-k-NRMrMjL; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D104120815; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:04:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id b3so11450971wrs.13; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:04:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=A8LLrIAgHNF4G/wK9+9uWioZIXq+yXGHhH6LtsrXOYg=; b=WqYxYC4cyN30rdkSaLDbCsZG8+ISOg7vrucGm/RnOQFuID9VpcTPq8AwPAf7/SStvg 5FPI7lW9QgekHu+GggRUE55wVzlXSr4fUmvXhE5C3Wy+0tNZGF92wvCb1ZVzdlBtKJKf X0AqhBlAwtFUDyorr5BwS73a2REc2Oom8NTCR5NS4WmQb/a1dRbPqx/agfBY9BUX4Jcx 9Bve+DtKE7phD/e38kx0koY/oxlUedn/42V3FS6woZeIQLL2/TZ4JUg1B97gRt0OUPY5 OS+J7oB+8JL3x1ZnqZGx9KaSBul4NMDJ2SQG9Cti7mGSjHnEKvVI+05Tcrx4j3mskXyy jP3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=A8LLrIAgHNF4G/wK9+9uWioZIXq+yXGHhH6LtsrXOYg=; b=tu6EjE5NIyttDzWuaoI7nyiT98xrwPOaQta615WzmvFO/mB7PZd0XN8E6ECEujh/ai KNe8hIY1W+hyeNDhuG8778eSu5KlnpWAYk7iuL5Eglncw3c8xD1sTSVoqCtIZC3FAzYu U9YB7dYwngPML6Sd5AqtwpAOG5QgeHvASGxMtlQRq+84B75e29L0/3Z+nbExo97JFOqr EMpnNdmycv45JDKWzYRyPlAq8dgJ9HiT8fVmEfWBo/5HZzdfBA2Rh7qrY7b+0URAqy4w LPIo37+/sgVEBhAgCmX8jttHdGthFFeelH9EXj2j5rXD92EGqSni+oQDsDZx/w7T9zv8 aZIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW95HLQACU9NbMpqBSKL/AiYWWjaI7WQsvbjPs2jew9I1JUVXV2 u+akmNwqxIxfQ1CACc8XIbaAgepB/vU2+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzP8lmt9LuqoT5kchHRQEQOg+IX5OuT1d+YlBuUnrWurlpCAMXL1fouuPBx5LVFXjhLLKvGjw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:8481:: with SMTP id 1mr25450990wrg.189.1572876288469; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOPFLHJVQJ ([31.223.40.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14sm5098489wrc.65.2019.11.04.06.04.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:04:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4.all@ietf.org, dtn@ietf.org
References: <157277273543.13502.15873902223747830235@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157277273543.13502.15873902223747830235@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 15:04:46 +0100
Message-ID: <016901d59318$d1ceb220$756c1660$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGm5ZxxqA91kUILDHgVPb1swKeghafYZWEQ
Content-Language: de
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/MgV2vvjsvV3eIxPE5BOZNi_DTK0>
Subject: Re: [dtn] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-15
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 14:05:00 -0000

Please find below the corrected review text, which as I see is not sent to
related maillists:

I reviewed the document "Delay-Tolerant Networking TCP Convergence Layer
Protocol Version 4 (draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-15) as part of the Operational
directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
operational area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

Intended status: Standards Track
Current IESG state: In Last Call (ends 2019-11-06)
IANA State: IANA - Review Needed 

Summary: 

The document describes a revised protocol for the TCP-based convergence
layer (TCPCL) for Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN).  The protocol revision is
based on implementation issues in the original TCPCL Version 3 of RFC7242
and updates to the Bundle Protocol contents, encodings, and convergence
layer requirements in Bundle Protocol Version 7.

There are nits in the document:
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5246 (Obsoleted by RFC 8446)
== Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of
draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-14

As far as I can see the document does not cause any issues related to
operations and management. 
The document can be published.

Mehmet

> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPS-DIR <ops-dir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mehmet Ersue via
> Datatracker
> Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2019 10:19 AM
> To: ops-dir@ietf.org
> Cc: last-call@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4.all@ietf.org; dtn@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-tcpclv4-15
> 
> Reviewer: Mehmet Ersue
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> I reviewed the document "Support for Short-Term, Automatically-Renewed
> (STAR)
> Certificates in        Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
> (draft-ietf-acme-star-06) as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area
> directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
> other last call comments.
> 
> Intended status: Standards Track
> Current IESG state: In Last Call (ends 2019-11-06) IANA State: IANA -
Review
> Needed
> 
> Summary:
> The document describes a revised protocol for the TCP-based convergence
> layer
> (TCPCL) for Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN).  The protocol revision is
based
> on implementation issues in the original TCPCL Version 3 of RFC7242 and
> updates to the Bundle Protocol contents, encodings, and convergence layer
> requirements in Bundle Protocol Version 7.
> 
> There are nits in the document:
> ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5246 (Obsoleted by RFC 8446) ==
> Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of
draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-14
> 
> As far as I can see the document does not cause any issues related to
> operations and management. The document can be published.
> 
> Mehmet
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPS-DIR mailing list
> OPS-DIR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ops-dir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email