IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dtn] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-00.txt

Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com> Wed, 02 September 2020 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <BSipos@rkf-eng.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5463A0DCB for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rkf-eng.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xv_oop8QB_8O for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam10on2068.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.94.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E34453A0C50 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 07:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mB6qOWx2OCIxuvAuGioaVkYnwcZUS9hcmYbaedWt6iiicqztLYx7fIwfDCXMsD6qyuwgadzu9zhWKJbLGYhFmVhNrXUuxnzR8mm9uCo06bsfDqc2rwf4z5GFbV2ru/ZyrgPtAqhcA+MqLJQ5IBr9wpxoxZgVURWdcKPAs1rEYAnRx2w9bgEC4wf2Xey+s8VFgtajtNMGfwwao2V3IqjAfmR95LvXbe6wsTDA8UoUGTSFN2OqiAGae0D0su3R36+1eRsqJZ0GsdjVMmfp2VHKxqYYYIKmGhrFIovqbwhqKkhOXD50ZLpzofsf7SRnwlNNW3k0XBtGlF5LKn8jviH67w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JcHP9Sf5sXsfJERJzbWO8vBb4ey4evcm+JvuT7AkLZg=; b=cWW93VNzMzr5SjWcuX1qdMSWIXMPZTRvnjmsH+gzwXxEVykgqUjS5EPZ6idngmnM+VuuHEV3mk4PemDBTCGJOKNoq9dIHP35k0CuJGd6073zO1NnYcOhe9ONt4nm+v4rdfoKfcykeDI7Y2Pad4kVGTi6qBrLUxCbNyevdS/hNmlGUSi9RW/tYfVNHD9XkkeHEmAG47FdA1zceTwyw6X7d79JBumM5nyKE4Jb8pZdjvwmRUzteibyLhVNzAc0INzzaP2W8Onwsrbrg9dKgOdkN/M1u4bdJaB7gaOgKop61aEQQk7nfthJaH6e7AMYCcalf1mhelviRnZSaLl7s6y+tg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rkf-eng.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=rkf-eng.com; dkim=pass header.d=rkf-eng.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rkf-eng.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JcHP9Sf5sXsfJERJzbWO8vBb4ey4evcm+JvuT7AkLZg=; b=TVRh/OAicCgOZr1UXMDFK7dUjO4+1Xfk9tLKpROUNGBXw/NQOubByAWNMXjkZrm/XfITS9YvoQaJAOZFuKng+i2yrM6aRP/gKaN5iYlRDbfyiTrNQ/8g8s03i0m5owA5NLEiO/qNtMOHJKGV5nO6hGC/IrcjHPplov1v5hPKhsc=
Received: from MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:168::10) by MN2PR13MB2943.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:138::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.7; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:00:46 +0000
Received: from MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2d8f:101:ed5f:2f4c]) by MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2d8f:101:ed5f:2f4c%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.015; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 14:00:46 +0000
From: Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com>
To: "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWfCrgpIiyQAR9k0Wu2soGOqY+k6lVVkPs
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:00:46 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR13MB356784086FE6977C007E03F99F2F0@MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159850266133.13898.5113992858088541261@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159850266133.13898.5113992858088541261@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=rkf-eng.com;
x-originating-ip: [108.18.140.127]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 08c155c4-c86d-485f-9550-08d84f489719
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR13MB2943:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR13MB29435C069F38495FB948EF779F2F0@MN2PR13MB2943.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ETi8LpoTk7QHf9FYN38Pg4OfGvyFGUgLBA5UBMOySvqJepT0IP0VG83qPmlg2neR5/ekYevkssS4VuVpkSfV0iPkjaGLmF79/SUb5nrANkWsHuC9N75Q4QLXdI0QWWaFXSDMSxkpHGQiiEKUp9kh6J6dYPzFNXQCTB9NJNINqhgoyBEzgkgOu3pNYh+DIiKZTsioF5vUrHc/UMdmB+SK/RiHKEjgzpTipHyEeX1BHFvT6Nez3iKm+fl/nw8c3Kahr9Rrzye0L93GDZ48Q6mGK4UDsYdshoFU3QBw+WiQTQXXXaaE+jx9VmrEfkbanvgObRkTQtlV5TBZaRRVsNQu2AGiMMD4RJOdkNB9v40G2sFKBt/X9mfT4l5eZm+CAatO/NgO1eGZwGVcqNhvRTYdnQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39830400003)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(55016002)(71200400001)(83380400001)(66574015)(33656002)(478600001)(9686003)(316002)(52536014)(45080400002)(5660300002)(7696005)(186003)(64756008)(6916009)(8936002)(66476007)(66446008)(166002)(15650500001)(26005)(6506007)(53546011)(966005)(2906002)(76116006)(66946007)(66556008)(19627405001)(8676002)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR13MB356784086FE6977C007E03F99F2F0MN2PR13MB3567namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: rkf-eng.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR13MB3567.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 08c155c4-c86d-485f-9550-08d84f489719
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Sep 2020 14:00:46.2871 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4ed8b15b-911f-42bc-8524-d89148858535
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xhNqgf8bLVku+GktzAOFur1MevjWkPucqfu4d1T5o32354Su3KhS2VCqlfMnVtDkTl+OupAu0h20YqozbLOHbw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR13MB2943
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/8jsz3rVwDBObCKI0mV3p7C9V3p0>
Subject: [dtn] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:00:55 -0000

All,
The ACME WG has chosen to adopt the draft about validating PKIX claims for a DTN Node ID. This is good news but also means another draft has a normative reference to the BPbis draft.

So far, between this draft and the TCPCL use of PKIX, only a Node ID (not a generic EID) has been used with authentication mechanisms. But they use consistent use of non-normalized URI comparisons (i.e. opaque text comparison). At the moment there is no specified logic to correlate different EIDs with the same "ipn" node number or "dtn" node-name.

________________________________
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 00:31
To: acme-chairs@ietf.org <acme-chairs@ietf.org>; Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com>; Brian Sipos <BSipos@rkf-eng.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Brian Sipos and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid
Revision:       00
Title:          Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension
Document date:  2020-08-26
Group:          acme
Pages:          18
URL:            https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Finternet-drafts%2Fdraft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-00.txt&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbsipos%40rkf-eng.com%7C4484e69327ba44c52e1108d84a420149%7C4ed8b15b911f42bc8524d89148858535%7C1%7C0%7C637340994649085264&amp;sdata=RMHF5Zk%2FophI5qFMrIhX3ohFIkWLUJ4kTKZ27S215TE%3D&amp;reserved=0
Status:         https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbsipos%40rkf-eng.com%7C4484e69327ba44c52e1108d84a420149%7C4ed8b15b911f42bc8524d89148858535%7C1%7C0%7C637340994649085264&amp;sdata=iVhiAJYTf1KTJtNvnQH5%2FY2IsLGr82mC1L4tGnE%2Fqxo%3D&amp;reserved=0
Htmlized:       https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-00&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbsipos%40rkf-eng.com%7C4484e69327ba44c52e1108d84a420149%7C4ed8b15b911f42bc8524d89148858535%7C1%7C0%7C637340994649085264&amp;sdata=nhxcoWSBZpsk%2Bu4MtymEe2tSNFbLhdg8D9xEo9WLcCA%3D&amp;reserved=0
Htmlized:       https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cbsipos%40rkf-eng.com%7C4484e69327ba44c52e1108d84a420149%7C4ed8b15b911f42bc8524d89148858535%7C1%7C0%7C637340994649085264&amp;sdata=mM49RfCMlHUQ%2FytcdIJ8vtFe1PeRNnTUNj5fanGYjLA%3D&amp;reserved=0


Abstract:
   This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate
   Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to
   validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME
   client.  The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject
   Alternative Name (SAN) of type Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) and
   ACME Identifier type "uri".




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email