[dtn] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-dtn-01-02: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 November 2021 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB433A13D2; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:53:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: dtn-chairs@ietf.org, dtn@ietf.org, Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.40.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <163828758961.11406.6863725352841598240@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 07:53:09 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/NINXVBI_-6zjJ6rRV8xZ2njjQMQ>
Subject: [dtn] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-dtn-01-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:53:10 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-dtn-01-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dtn/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am puzzled by merging two different aspects in a single category: "Operations, Administration and Management (OAM), and Key Management". The first one is clearly OPS but the second one is probably more in SEC area. What is the meaning of QoS and QoS indication in such networks ? Should there be a collaboration with intarea WG about the tunnels ? While there is a "Management Architecture and Protocols" milestone, there are none about "operations and administration" (to fully fit the OAM category). Some nits ?: - s/in production by government and commercial organizations world-wide./in production by governments and commercial organizations world-wide./ - s/Operations, Administration and Management/Operations, Administration, and Management/ - s/best practices learned from existing deployment./best practices learned from existing deployments./
- [dtn] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [dtn] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-i… Rick Taylor
- Re: [dtn] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-i… Zaheduzzaman Sarker
- Re: [dtn] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-i… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [dtn] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-i… Zaheduzzaman Sarker