IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with COMMENT)

"Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu> Sat, 08 February 2020 00:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889C112008B; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:25:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhuapl.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZI0Q_AHVR6U; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aplegw02.jhuapl.edu (aplegw02.jhuapl.edu [128.244.251.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFC11200B3; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:25:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aplegw02.jhuapl.edu [127.0.0.1]) by aplegw02.jhuapl.edu (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0180OGQA124459; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:25:25 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhuapl.edu; h=from : to : cc : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version : subject; s=JHUAPLDec2018; bh=y8hoMwpfyUQssrErJP/SdcOvO2fO/0SOrvvOMJrj30Q=; b=QcnUBTMc5NLu0lV4ua/yAMjDRmDgwzzAvxS7t1IsE3ufKP3/iRAcuXbxmPPetiTd0wHE BJ2xUU5eE4qJ3NUHAc65tPc1/ZdnLtiBPvgrGkL5Jrazwc4LBokulBtTN01ZrI3qcXhe aFuKo3PHsFxC1LQJT2OR5gaK2KGklqSNE1qGQmViw76h2uLPkUmwX72JvU9vPPh4GcjY G3aFa+zAzIMurIO1nVg6qlAQFzUhAVPHww+xvZ3VBihF4it9vyP1Te97oRZz71QDJa5R LKG8UhDkc8pJS8Wypzl4a0xAEMeRDb/4+qgcxdDaaxOv0xZu8+tVbZuElCipmXk3fHyx Rg==
Received: from aplex03.dom1.jhuapl.edu (aplex03.dom1.jhuapl.edu [128.244.198.7]) by aplegw02.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 2xyhp8ny95-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:25:25 -0500
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: APLEX03.dom1.jhuapl.edu
Received: from aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu (128.244.198.5) by APLEX03.dom1.jhuapl.edu (128.244.198.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:25:24 -0500
Received: from aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::19f5:dcc5:c696:1a50]) by aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::19f5:dcc5:c696:1a50%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:25:24 -0500
From: "Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec@ietf.org>, Scott Burleigh <Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, "dtn-chairs@ietf.org" <dtn-chairs@ietf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXT] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHV3PIVAxx7mAGQf0CBsdOGb34oa6gQclEQ
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:25:23 +0000
Message-ID: <9c45f48fee784f24ae667ec6d2215267@aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
References: <158099603411.12272.4523908707537197688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158099603411.12272.4523908707537197688.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [128.244.198.168]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: APLEX03.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-07_06:2020-02-07, 2020-02-07 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/SMjucm1HGfbFHUVk0cmvQxYdjXY>
Subject: Re: [dtn] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:25:30 -0000

Alissa,

  Thank you for the review. I have updated a new version of BPSEC  (BPSEC20) which I believe addresses your COMENTS. 

  Specific comments are in-line below.  I have enumerated the comment items as **C# to aid in referencing these points going forward.

-Ed

Edward J. Birrane, III, Ph.D.
Embedded Applications Group Supervisor
Principal Staff, Space Exploration Sector
Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory
(W) 443-778-7423 / (F) 443-228-3839


-----Original Message-----
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:34 AM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec@ietf.org; Scott Burleigh <Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>; dtn-chairs@ietf.org; Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov; dtn@ietf.org
Subject: [EXT] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with COMMENT)

APL external email warning: Verify sender noreply@ietf.org before clicking links or attachments 

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Mirja's and Benjamin's DISCUSSes.

In Section 3.8:

"o  It is RECOMMENDED that designers carefully consider the effect of
      setting flags that either discard the block or delete the bundle
      in the event that this block cannot be processed.

**C1: Agreed. This has been corrected in BPSEC20.

   o  The BCB block processing control flags can be set independently
      from the processing control flags of the security target(s).  The
      setting of such flags SHOULD be an implementation/policy decision
      for the encrypting node."

**C2: Agreed. This has been corrected in BPSEC20.

Both of these uses of normative language seem inappropriate.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email