Re: [dtn] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu> Sat, 08 February 2020 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D79C1200B6; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:24:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhuapl.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4LTnR9Q2iA7; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aplegw01.jhuapl.edu (aplegw01.jhuapl.edu [128.244.251.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68CDE1200B3; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (aplegw01.jhuapl.edu [127.0.0.1]) by aplegw01.jhuapl.edu (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0180O3Dr174522; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:24:03 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhuapl.edu; h=from : to : cc : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version : subject; s=JHUAPLDec2018; bh=auhUJLDklE1Nhe7R2adWp+teM2RKl9KPdKikBHR18Ro=; b=XpP98a6X3VSXHehlmuzGEJK3z0LDXr65sfsdF6WYJpDw7JbB7amqWRxUgrlpJdN0XOtj umKcJjojQOy44NqEXsYR80R8BzpDtfhYowygfw+h/g16gwGJvEpJwXvdHKKZBBsWJDB/ rEMumsUb/6VaAI8tR0nMsonFSOW3XgdJzmj5OQhf6QBVbjl0T47kKwB2IQTBrcCogtzu hHf1SqeN7mg/c+XrMi1oXoGp5wdPn6jXxXerE++Y80ROK4E7WLnZctYhzt75I8z1RRUT W4z4JBtL7LabfVM520O0TXNEMZ6L5kLruJ/UrlsvSp0ioPMI9sKmcvA48rFy+C1OKvN8 uA==
Received: from aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu (aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu [128.244.198.5]) by aplegw01.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 2y1ctqh2wf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Feb 2020 19:24:03 -0500
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu
Received: from aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu (128.244.198.5) by aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu (128.244.198.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:23:37 -0500
Received: from aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::19f5:dcc5:c696:1a50]) by aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([fe80::19f5:dcc5:c696:1a50%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:23:37 -0500
From: "Birrane, Edward J." <Edward.Birrane@jhuapl.edu>
To: =?utf-8?B?TWlyamEgS8O8aGxld2luZA==?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec@ietf.org>, "Scott Burleigh" <Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, "dtn-chairs@ietf.org" <dtn-chairs@ietf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?W0VYVF0gTWlyamEgS8O8aGxld2luZCdzIERpc2N1c3Mgb24gZHJhZnQtaWV0?= =?utf-8?Q?f-dtn-bpsec-18:_(with_DISCUSS_and_COMMENT)?=
Thread-Index: AQHV2oN8Vg2Wl8yHMkynIcYG8bByEagOMZxQ
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 00:23:36 +0000
Message-ID: <035730f96e28463a8141b026079bf3c3@aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
References: <158072863257.28637.8806505241822600245.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158072863257.28637.8806505241822600245.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [128.244.198.168]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: aplex01.dom1.jhuapl.edu
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-07_06:2020-02-07, 2020-02-07 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/VXJ3FB3mQQKC6WpWL32B1sQW6oI>
Subject: Re: [dtn] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_Discuss_on_draft-ietf-d?= =?utf-8?q?tn-bpsec-18=3A_=28with_DISCUSS_and_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:24:07 -0000

Mirja,

  Thank you for the review. I have updated a new version of BPSEC  (BPSEC20) which attempts to address your DISCUSS and COMMENTS below.

  Specific comments are in-line below.  I have enumerated the Discuss items as **D# and the comment items as **C# to aid in referencing these points going forward.

-Ed

---
Edward J. Birrane, III, Ph.D.
Embedded Applications Group Supervisor
Space Exploration Sector
Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory
(W) 443-778-7423 / (F) 443-228-3839
  


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2020 6:17 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec@ietf.org; Scott Burleigh
> <Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>ov>; dtn-chairs@ietf.org;
> Scott.C.Burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov; dtn@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXT] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: (with
> DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> APL external email warning: Verify sender noreply@ietf.org before clicking
> links or attachments
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-18: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Sec 1.2 says:
> "A sample security
>    context has been defined ([I-D.ietf-dtn-bpsec-interop-sc]) to support
>    interoperability testing and serve as an exemplar for how security
>    contexts should be defined for this specification."
> However I don't really understand how interoperability can be reached if
> there is not at least one security context that is mandatory to implement in
> this draft (especially as ietf-dtn-bpsec-interop-sc is expired for more than
> half a year already)...?

**D1: I have added a new Section 9.1 to BPSEC20 which describes the desired approach to BPSec and security contexts.  I have also updated ietf-dtn-bpsec-interop-sc which should be going into WG last call.

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Please use the updated disclaimer in rfc8174.
> 

**C1: Agreed. The disclaimer has been updated in BPSEC20.

-Ed