IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-11 wrong number of item in section 4.2.3

Marco Kaulea <marco.kaulea@gmail.com> Sat, 06 April 2019 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <marco.kaulea@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBFA120363 for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MOqmPxbFg6_K for <dtn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB7C120357 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 12:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id p20so11187258qtc.9 for <dtn@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 12:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Z99DuDGZqKWRvmXqasPBdPlxxGdgF+ua0y39BbI/jZA=; b=YnIQ1p9LTaSCFKzyFDla+D70gLs4HdNqW60JmVqYneAvSan/V+LFd7ZGD7PKwrSKel IDp5F/wCXC2IZt+0RDJzngFRIg0gGWTnxFKDIJ/4GaOUZBYoL/qGkwV0YZK+4cmgNHe8 OfrvHRlocjD+YVjMSrNG16bTMhsuwA7E0Io53RvB9m+UW9h70LZnuoxK+et7rlu/5+Nb MzQ/aSCzCYgNAs7oOi5TCXJP9agkV6iKCc2br/e/Qr+KBlBbQVpwFuGFZuugYghLcg9f 5VGe3wS4X4pryO140d9hAapljjHkU/HGoV0jqNCoXk49ZJ3O86Tr5nX99u3RRx/Yk4iT G5Fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Z99DuDGZqKWRvmXqasPBdPlxxGdgF+ua0y39BbI/jZA=; b=cVXK4DA/l3IpwKohgf5fGmlub2JAlQcfSmCldIO3fDHjSGFV+tEwkWxXeicv7cJ5EZ 0KqCFkaFevus1jqaW1WWIu/9iybNJY14mt71lqWRPnBA9sFvvwRuZH7GZMnDQQWxHmOL Mg15frzXpt3YhjyJlp/W6aLwqmzTD2tjnAYqPl1b8AmZYAH6aYkgvWj/huaztqNYesvQ InsbEIPrRypSd9ir/qbifyk9CclVh+I3LsMVJkBcSqMplhPYV7k0Fq16ggEU4mjPStUN inRlg0xRgcRRQS4KYDh4QRS8Ii2mS3t025gYJRVh6zsKy9z31yz3mptKd66xMDkZUw5J ptvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU0bSpwg4qYciWVMl2VWFaKnWN1E2cLoFDlxqK/Iqt2dAQghtlc 4f7WbvcBBbSSVHHk6IBpNC9VzazEUHdJF9QsPa2Jadtg
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxLIPSlaFaljlh4OBeqBX3/iep3332aBjmslaaSAxTrqF5bVNZyPVndU0bbDvdzX91Pt2K68+3oBdtHd007Hw8=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d28c:: with SMTP id q12mr17069046qvh.88.1554580228406; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 12:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANoKrvZqTdZBwK0_ncTntbGwpuVNAWeiT4CXayUM2sfKJ+q0vA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANoKrvZqTdZBwK0_ncTntbGwpuVNAWeiT4CXayUM2sfKJ+q0vA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marco Kaulea <marco.kaulea@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 21:50:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF0cjT_PSHwOT+4mXKyqp+xzO=45nuJwOPVkO89GgdpXTivBTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dtn@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/XT-Eqkop1uGIfDZZJvY5No1A57c>
Subject: Re: [dtn] draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-11 wrong number of item in section 4.2.3
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 19:50:31 -0000

Hi,

The same issue is found in section 4.2.2 Primary Bundle Block.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:41 AM Loiseau lucien <loiseau.lucien@gmail.com> wrote:
> there is a small mistake in the draft in section 4.2.3 (Canonical
> Bundle Block Format):
> Since the "block length" element was removed in the last revision of
> the draft, the number of elements in the array shall be 5 (if CRC type
> is zero) or 6 (otherwise).

Regards,

Marco Kaulea

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email