Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-22: (with COMMENT)

"Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov> Thu, 06 February 2020 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE3312009E; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:01:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jpl.nasa.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M_p5Ma95-sdE; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C15120099; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:01:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 016H0Gmv127390; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:01:16 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jpl.nasa.gov; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=InSight1906; bh=RCjeZlNQpvAGfIJICgvSw6R3ILmNzOeWyVo1EsD8tuI=; b=acaGo4+Klz/GHetkTTpMDK/72jlS82JbwOCtirFcZ4liSBqhdwoHolAsUp+VccYDs/2U dNOFbhYy5hj9VX0RTsvqZjQODZr+nOAdEHOdfS5i1Is146yeLI86EP7rZYhjRHj/M4UA fE8Lu3ulMgdAz6OnzRxR+8OPTu3dl+o0yDDKke4WMz2Cvi7y9Jbr107WZuQMM3ahLC8c m15KHd7TXJOPfWg7oeKpgDoYagqNI/PEJ5NXiMrCzuG/tvjSp7e9xCKmAUByclrDm4nc 1TS5NH/nVGPxswXdrstKayxVQgnIrrzYjq/eFBMDZR+dKvOITHx2G0FBAu/K15Vofw7n 1w==
Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altphysenclup01.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.52]) by ppa01.jpl.nasa.gov with ESMTP id 2y0mgj8hg3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:01:14 -0800
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (ap-embx16-sp10.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.83]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id 016H1Dow031466 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128 bits) verified FAIL); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:01:14 -0800
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL (2002:8095:8953::8095:8953) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:01:13 -0800
Received: from ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b]) by ap-embx16-sp10.RES.AD.JPL ([fe80::4:f430:47b5:767b%17]) with mapi id 15.01.1591.008; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:01:13 -0800
From: "Burleigh, Scott C (US 312B)" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis@ietf.org>, "Fred Templin" <fred.l.templin@boeing.com>, "dtn-chairs@ietf.org" <dtn-chairs@ietf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXTERNAL] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-22: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHV3KxtwZN1YYfNEUCphnCtKcZUz6gOZGtA
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:01:13 +0000
Message-ID: <98eef765f56a455e8eccb5832b1be656@jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <158096611628.30557.13131316023658289741.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158096611628.30557.13131316023658289741.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [207.151.104.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Source-IP: ap-embx16-sp10.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.137.83]
X-Source-Sender: scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Authorized
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-06_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=815 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2002060130
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn/XVtD1Eusui2JYnIdvYxtilqC0TU>
Subject: Re: [dtn] [EXTERNAL] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dtn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Delay Tolerant Networking \(DTN\) discussion list at the IETF." <dtn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dtn/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn>, <mailto:dtn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 17:01:21 -0000

Certainly!  That change will appear in the next draft.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 9:15 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis@ietf.org; Fred Templin <fred.l.templin@boeing.com>om>; dtn-chairs@ietf.org; fred.l.templin@boeing.com; dtn@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-22: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dtn-bpbis-22: No Objection

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support the Sec ADs’ DISCUSS and comment points.  I have only a small thing to add to what’s already been said:

— Section 1 —
You mention RFC5050 several times here, but it isn’t actually cited as a reference until Section 10.1.  You would normally put it in as a citation the first time, at the beginning of Section 1, and I think you should.